e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended July 1, 2005
Commission file number 1-5560
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
04-2302115 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
20 Sylvan Road, Woburn, Massachusetts
|
|
01801 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (781) 376-3000
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
þ Yes o No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at July 29, 2005 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.25 per share
|
|
158,396,222 |
The Exhibit Index is located on page 37
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 1, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
116,940 |
|
|
$ |
123,505 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
112,526 |
|
|
|
85,034 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
6,013 |
|
|
|
6,013 |
|
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,475 and $1,987, respectively |
|
|
162,006 |
|
|
|
157,772 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
81,188 |
|
|
|
79,572 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
8,804 |
|
|
|
11,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
487,477 |
|
|
|
463,864 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and amortization
of $305,824 and $261,260, respectively |
|
|
143,177 |
|
|
|
143,534 |
|
Property held for sale |
|
|
6,588 |
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
494,998 |
|
|
|
504,493 |
|
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $8,375 and $6,746,
respectively |
|
|
18,266 |
|
|
|
19,895 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
17,125 |
|
|
|
19,372 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
13,412 |
|
|
|
11,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,181,043 |
|
|
$ |
1,168,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
62,122 |
|
|
|
73,405 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
29,322 |
|
|
|
36,630 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
15,188 |
|
|
|
21,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
156,632 |
|
|
|
181,251 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
6,679 |
|
|
|
5,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
393,311 |
|
|
|
417,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value: 25,000 authorized, no shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.25 par value: 525,000 shares authorized; 158,291 and
156,012 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
|
|
39,573 |
|
|
|
39,003 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,325,592 |
|
|
|
1,312,603 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(576,647 |
) |
|
|
(599,197 |
) |
Accumulated comprehensive loss |
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
787,732 |
|
|
|
751,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,181,043 |
|
|
$ |
1,168,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net revenues |
|
$ |
191,532 |
|
|
$ |
207,377 |
|
|
$ |
602,197 |
|
|
$ |
565,956 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
113,658 |
|
|
|
123,593 |
|
|
|
363,705 |
|
|
|
340,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
77,874 |
|
|
|
83,784 |
|
|
|
238,492 |
|
|
|
225,556 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
39,823 |
|
|
|
38,712 |
|
|
|
115,612 |
|
|
|
114,250 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
25,745 |
|
|
|
26,493 |
|
|
|
78,027 |
|
|
|
69,427 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,759 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
66,104 |
|
|
|
65,973 |
|
|
|
195,457 |
|
|
|
201,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
11,770 |
|
|
|
17,811 |
|
|
|
43,035 |
|
|
|
23,814 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,683 |
) |
|
|
(3,610 |
) |
|
|
(10,851 |
) |
|
|
(14,386 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
3,724 |
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net |
|
|
(2,147 |
) |
|
|
(3,214 |
) |
|
|
(7,127 |
) |
|
|
(13,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
9,623 |
|
|
|
14,597 |
|
|
|
35,908 |
|
|
|
10,579 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
2,234 |
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
13,358 |
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
7,389 |
|
|
$ |
13,030 |
|
|
$ |
22,550 |
|
|
$ |
7,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, basic |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, diluted |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
157,809 |
|
|
|
153,062 |
|
|
|
157,161 |
|
|
|
150,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
158,682 |
|
|
|
155,274 |
|
|
|
158,621 |
|
|
|
152,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,550 |
|
|
$ |
7,781 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
27,949 |
|
|
|
26,036 |
|
Non-cash special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,853 |
|
Tax adjustment to goodwill |
|
|
9,495 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
1,623 |
|
Contribution of common shares to savings and retirement plans |
|
|
8,770 |
|
|
|
5,267 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
219 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
(4,234 |
) |
|
|
(12,263 |
) |
Inventories, net |
|
|
(1,616 |
) |
|
|
(28,797 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
2,129 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(11,283 |
) |
|
|
38,152 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(12,589 |
) |
|
|
9,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
43,773 |
|
|
|
63,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(27,639 |
) |
|
|
(43,361 |
) |
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(891,120 |
) |
|
|
(890,194 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments |
|
|
863,630 |
|
|
|
809,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(55,129 |
) |
|
|
(124,273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(701 |
) |
Proceeds from short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,319 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
4,790 |
|
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
4,790 |
|
|
|
10,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(6,565 |
) |
|
|
(50,219 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
123,505 |
|
|
|
161,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
116,940 |
|
|
$ |
111,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes paid |
|
$ |
1,567 |
|
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
12,415 |
|
|
$ |
14,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (Skyworks or the Company) is a global leader in analog, mixed signal
and digital semiconductors for mobile communications applications. The Companys power amplifiers,
front-end modules, direct conversion transceivers and complete cellular system solutions are at the
heart of many of todays leading-edge multimedia handsets, cellular base stations, and wireless
networking platforms. Skyworks also offers a portfolio of highly innovative linear products,
supporting a diverse set of automotive, broadband, industrial and medical customers.
On June 25, 2002, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of December 16,
2001, as amended as of April 12, 2002, by and among Alpha Industries, Inc. (Alpha), Conexant
Systems, Inc. (Conexant) and Washington Sub, Inc. (Washington), a wholly owned subsidiary of
Conexant to which Conexant spun off its wireless communications business, including its gallium
arsenide wafer fabrication facility located in Newbury Park, California, but excluding certain
assets and liabilities, Washington merged with and into Alpha with Alpha as the surviving entity
(the Merger). Following the Merger, Alpha changed its corporate name to Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
Immediately following completion of the Merger, the Company purchased Conexants semiconductor
assembly, module manufacturing and test facility located in Mexicali, Mexico, and certain related
operations (Mexicali Operations) for $150.0 million. For financial accounting purposes, the sale
of the Mexicali Operations by Conexant to Skyworks was treated as if Conexant had
contributed the Mexicali Operations to Washington as part of the spin-off, and the $150.0 million
purchase price was treated as a return of capital to Conexant. For purposes of these financial
statements, the Washington business and the Mexicali Operations are collectively referred to as
Washington/Mexicali.
The Merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition whereby Washington was treated as the
acquirer and Alpha as the acquiree, primarily because Conexant shareholders owned a majority,
approximately 67 percent, of the Company upon completion of the Merger. Under a reverse
acquisition, the purchase price of Alpha was based upon the fair market value of Alpha common stock
for a reasonable period of time before and after the announcement date of the Merger and the fair
value of Alpha stock options. The purchase price of Alpha was allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed by Washington, as the acquiring company for accounting purposes, based upon
their estimated fair market value at the acquisition date.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC). Certain information and
footnote disclosures, normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. However, in the opinion of
management, the financial information reflects all adjustments, consisting of adjustments of a
normal recurring nature necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations,
and cash flows of the Company. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended June
30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. This
information should be read in conjunction with the Companys financial statements and notes thereto
contained in the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 1, 2004 as filed with the
SEC.
Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
6
Fiscal Periods The Companys fiscal year ends on the Friday closest to September 30. For
convenience, the consolidated financial statements have been shown as ending on the last day of the
calendar month. Fiscal year 2004 ended on October 1, 2004 and the third quarters of fiscal 2005 and
fiscal 2004 actually ended on July 1, 2005 and July 2, 2004, respectively.
Revenue Recognition Revenues from product sales are recognized upon shipment and transfer of
title, in accordance with the shipping terms specified in the arrangement with the customer.
Revenue from license fees is recognized when these fees are due and payable, and all other criteria
of SAB 104 have been met. Revenue recognition is deferred in all instances where the earnings
process is incomplete. Certain product sales are made to electronic component distributors under
agreements allowing for price protection and/or a right of return on unsold products. A reserve for
sales returns and allowances for customers is recorded based on historical experience or specific
identification of an event necessitating a reserve.
Income Taxes It was the Companys intention to permanently reinvest the undistributed earnings of
its foreign subsidiaries in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 23.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2005 the Company reversed its policy of permanently
reinvesting the earnings of its Mexican business. No provision has been made for U.S. federal,
state, or additional foreign income taxes that would be due upon the actual or deemed distribution
of undistributed earnings of our other foreign subsidiaries, which have been or are intended to be
permanently reinvested.
Reclassification In the second quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company concluded that it was
appropriate to classify its auction rate securities as short-term investments. Previously, such
investments had been classified as cash and cash equivalents. The Company made adjustments
amounting to $80.0 million to its Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2004, to reflect
this reclassification and made adjustments to its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
nine months ended June 30, 2004, to reflect the gross purchases and sales of these securities as
investing activities rather than as a component of cash and cash equivalents. This change in
classification does not affect cash flows from operations or from financing activities in the
previously reported Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, or the previously reported Consolidated
Income Statement.
Certain other reclassifications have been made to the prior years financial statements to conform
to the current years presentation.
Leases and Amortization of Leasehold Improvements In the second fiscal quarter of 2005, the
Company recognized a $0.9 million charge for the correction of an error in the manner in which it
accounted for scheduled rent increases and amortization of leasehold improvements. The cumulative
effect of this error is being reported in the cost of goods sold, research and development and
selling general and administrative lines of the statement of operations amounting to $0.2 million,
$0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in the second quarter of fiscal 2005, as it did not
have a material impact in prior periods.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 151 Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.
The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period
charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred
during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not believe the impact of
adopting SFAS No. 151 will have a material impact on its financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. SFAS No.
123(R) requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be
recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the
equity or liability instruments issued. SFAS No. 123(R) covers a wide range of share-based
compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based
awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. SFAS No. 123(R) replaces SFAS
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as
preferable a
7
fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However,
that Statement permitted entities the option of continuing to apply the guidance in APB Opinion No.
25, as long as the footnotes to financial statements disclosed what net income would have been had
the preferable fair-value-based method been used. Public entities (other than those filing as small
business issuers) were initially required to apply SFAS No. 123(R) as of the first interim or
annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. In April 2005, the SEC issued a rule
amending the compliance date which allows companies to implement SFAS No. 123(R) at the beginning of
their next fiscal year, instead of the next reporting period, that begins after June 15, 2005.
As a result, we will implement SFAS No. 123(R) using the prospective method starting October 1, 2005.
Under this method, the Company will begin recognizing compensation cost for equity based compensation
for all new or modified grants after the date of adoption. For an illustration of the effect of using the
fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions on our recent results of
operations, see Note 9.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assetsan amendment of
APB Opinion No. 29. The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for
Nonmonetary Transactions, is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary
assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in APB
Opinion No. 29, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS No. 153 amends APB
Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets
and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have
commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is effective for such exchange transactions occurring in fiscal
periods beginning after June 15, 2005.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FSP No. 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes, to the Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 introduces a special 9% tax
deduction on qualified production activities. FSP No. 109-1 clarifies that this tax deduction should be
accounted for as a special tax deduction in accordance with SFAS No. 109. We do not expect the
adoption of this new tax provision to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows .
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143. This interpretation provides
additional guidance as to when companies should record the fair value of a liability for a
conditional asset retirement obligation when there is uncertainty about the timing and/or method
of settlement of the obligation. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this
issue on its financial statements, but does not believe the impact of any change, if necessary,
will be material.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Correctionsa replacement
of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. This Statement replaces APB
Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in
Interim Financial Statements an amendment of APB Opinion
No. 28, and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of
a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in an accounting
principle. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual
instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. When a
pronouncement includes specific transition provisions, those provisions should be followed. SFAS
No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and error corrections occurring in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005.
NOTE 2. INVENTORY
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Raw materials |
|
$ |
11,301 |
|
|
$ |
12,176 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
54,037 |
|
|
|
50,717 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
15,850 |
|
|
|
16,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,188 |
|
|
$ |
79,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
NOTE 3. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and intangible assets are principally the result of the Merger with Washington/Mexicali
completed on June 25, 2002. The Company tests its goodwill for impairment annually as of the
first day of its fourth fiscal quarter and in interim periods if certain events occur indicating
that the carrying value of goodwill may be impaired. The company completed its annual goodwill
impairment test for fiscal 2005 and determined that as of July 5, 2005, its goodwill was not
impaired.
Goodwill and intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
|
Average |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
|
Period (Years) |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
494,998 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
494,998 |
|
|
$ |
504,493 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
504,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technology |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10,550 |
|
|
|
(4,432 |
) |
|
|
6,118 |
|
|
|
10,550 |
|
|
|
(3,777 |
) |
|
|
6,773 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
12,700 |
|
|
|
(3,821 |
) |
|
|
8,879 |
|
|
|
12,700 |
|
|
|
(2,868 |
) |
|
|
9,832 |
|
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
23,372 |
|
|
|
(8,375 |
) |
|
|
14,997 |
|
|
|
23,372 |
|
|
|
(6,746 |
) |
|
|
16,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,641 |
|
|
$ |
(8,375 |
) |
|
$ |
18,266 |
|
|
$ |
26,641 |
|
|
$ |
(6,746 |
) |
|
$ |
19,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Amortization expense |
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
$ |
581 |
|
|
$ |
1,628 |
|
|
$ |
1,740 |
|
Annual amortization expense related to intangible assets is expected to be as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
Amortization
expense |
|
$ |
2,164 |
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
The changes in the gross carrying amount of goodwill and intangible assets are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed |
|
Customer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
Technology |
|
Relationships |
|
Trademarks |
|
Other |
|
Total |
Balance as of September 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
504,493 |
|
|
$ |
6,773 |
|
|
$ |
9,831 |
|
|
$ |
3,269 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
524,387 |
|
Additions (deductions) during year |
|
|
(9,495 |
) |
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
|
(952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(11,123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
494,998 |
|
|
$ |
6,118 |
|
|
$ |
8,879 |
|
|
$ |
3,269 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
513,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The deduction to goodwill in the nine months ended June 30, 2005 reflects the recognition of a
portion of the deferred tax assets for which no benefit was previously recognized as of the date of
the Merger. The future realization of certain pre-Merger deferred tax assets will be applied to
reduce the carrying value of goodwill. The remaining portion of the valuation allowance for these
pre-Merger deferred tax assets for which subsequently recognized tax benefits may be applied to
reduce goodwill is approximately $33.5 million at June 30, 2005.
9
NOTE 4. BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS
LONG-TERM DEBT
The Companys long-term debt consists of $230.0 million of 4.75 percent convertible
subordinated notes due November 2007. These notes can be converted into 110.4911 shares of common
stock per $1,000 principal balance, which is the equivalent of a conversion price of approximately
$9.05 per share. The total number of shares that could be issued under the notes is approximately
25.4 million shares. The Company may redeem the notes at any time after November 20, 2005. The
redemption price of the notes during the period between November 20, 2005 through November 14, 2006
will be $1,011.875 per $1,000 principal amount of notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, to the redemption date, and the redemption price of the notes beginning on
November 15, 2006 and thereafter will be $1,000 per $1,000 principal amount of notes to be
redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. Holders may require
the Company to repurchase the notes upon a change in control of the Company. The Company pays
interest in cash semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year.
SHORT-TERM DEBT
On July 15, 2003, the Company entered into a receivables purchase agreement under which it has
agreed to sell from time to time certain of its accounts receivable to Skyworks USA, Inc.
(Skyworks USA), a wholly owned special purpose entity that is fully consolidated for accounting
purposes. Concurrently, Skyworks USA entered into an agreement with Wachovia Bank, National
Association providing for a $50.0 million credit facility (Facility Agreement) secured by the
purchased accounts receivable. As a part of the consolidation, any interest incurred by Skyworks
USA related to monies it borrows under the Facility Agreement is recorded as interest expense in
the Companys results of operations. The Company performs collections and administrative functions
on behalf of Skyworks USA. Interest related to the Facility Agreement is at LIBOR plus 0.4%. As of
June 30, 2005, Skyworks USA had borrowings of $50.0 million outstanding under this agreement.
NOTE 5. SPECIAL CHARGES
Special charges consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Asset
impairments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,183 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSET IMPAIRMENTS
During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company recorded a $13.2 million charge primarily
related to the impairment of obsolete baseband technology licenses that were established prior to
the Merger. This charge included approximately $1.8 million of contractual payment obligations,
which substantially all amounts have been paid as of June 30, 2005. The impairment charge was based
on a recoverability analysis prepared by management based on the decision to discontinue certain
products and the related impact on its current and projected outlook. Management believed these
factors indicated that the carrying values of the related assets (intangible assets, machinery and
equipment) were impaired and that an impairment analysis should be performed. In performing the
analysis for recoverability, management estimated the future cash flows expected to result from
these products (salvage value). Since the estimated undiscounted cash flows were less than the
carrying value of the related assets, it was concluded that an impairment loss should be
recognized. In accordance with SFAS No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, the impairment charge was determined by comparing the estimated fair value of
the related assets to their carrying value. The write down established a new cost basis for the
impaired assets.
10
RESTRUCTURING
2004 Corporate Restructuring Plan
During fiscal 2004, the Company consolidated cellular systems software design centers in an effort
to improve the Companys overall time to market for next-generation multimedia systems development.
These actions aligned the Companys structure with its current business environment. The Company
implemented reductions in force at three remote facilities and recorded restructuring charges of
approximately $4.2 million for costs related to severance benefits for affected employees and lease
obligations. Substantially all amounts accrued for these actions have been paid and the remaining
amounts are expected to be paid during fiscal 2005.
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2004 restructuring actions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce |
|
Facility |
|
|
|
|
Reductions |
|
Closings |
|
Total |
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
$ |
3,685 |
|
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
$ |
4,183 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(3,530 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(3,817 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance, September
30, 2004 |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance, June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Corporate Restructuring Plans
During fiscal 2003, the Company recorded $6.2 million in restructuring charges to provide for
workforce reductions and the consolidation of facilities. The charge was based upon estimates of
the cost of severance benefits for affected employees and lease cancellation, facility sales, and
other costs related to the consolidation of facilities. As of June 30, 2005, substantially all
amounts accrued for these actions have been paid and the remaining amounts are expected to be paid
within one year.
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2003 restructuring actions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility |
|
|
|
|
Workforce |
|
Closings |
|
|
|
|
Reductions |
|
and Other |
|
Total |
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
4,819 |
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
6,224 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(3,510 |
) |
|
|
(1,236 |
) |
|
|
(4,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance, September 30, 2003 |
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,777 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance, September 30, 2004 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance, June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Merger Alpha Restructuring Plan
In addition, the Company assumed approximately $7.8 million of restructuring reserves from Alpha in
connection with the Merger. During the first nine months of fiscal 2005, and the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, payments related to the restructuring reserves assumed
from Alpha were $0.3 million, $0.2 million, $4.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively. In
addition, the Company reduced this restructuring reserve by approximately $0.5 million in fiscal
2004 primarily related to a reduction in facility closure costs. As of June 30, 2005, the
restructuring reserve balance related to Alpha was $1.0 million and primarily relates to estimated
future payments on a lease that expires in 2008.
11
NOTE 6. PENSIONS AND OTHER RETIREE BENEFITS
In connection with Conexants spin-off of its Washington/Mexicali business, Conexant transferred
obligations to Washington/Mexicali for its pension plan and retiree benefits. The amounts that were
transferred relate to approximately twenty Washington/Mexicali employees that had enrolled in
Conexants Voluntary Early Retirement Plan (VERP) in 1998. The VERP also provides health care
benefits to members of the plan. The Company currently does not offer pension plans or retiree
benefits to its employees.
The components of defined benefit expense are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retiree |
|
|
|
|
|
Retiree |
|
|
|
|
|
Retiree |
|
|
|
|
|
Retiree |
|
|
Pension |
|
Medical |
|
Pension |
|
Medical |
|
Pension |
|
Medical |
|
Pension |
|
Medical |
|
|
Benefits |
|
Benefits |
|
Benefits |
|
Benefits |
|
Benefits |
|
Benefits |
|
Benefits |
|
Benefits |
Service cost-benefits earned |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Estimated return on assets |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net amortization |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company contributed $0.1 and $0.3 million to the pension benefit plan during the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. The Company expects to contribute approximately
$0.1 million to the benefit pension plan in the remaining quarter of fiscal 2005.
NOTE 7. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The
Company follows SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, which establishes standards for the way
public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial
statements and in interim reports to shareholders. The method for determining what information to
report is based on the way that management organizes the segments within the Company for making
operating decisions and assessing financial performance. In evaluating financial performance,
management uses sales and operating profit as the measure of the
segments profit or loss. Based on
the guidance in SFAS No. 131, the Company has one operating segment for financial reporting
purposes, which is the design, development, manufacture and marketing of proprietary semiconductor
products and system solutions for manufacturers of wireless communication products.
NOTE 8. EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net income |
|
$ |
7,389 |
|
|
$ |
13,030 |
|
|
$ |
22,550 |
|
|
$ |
7,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
157,809 |
|
|
|
153,062 |
|
|
|
157,161 |
|
|
|
150,414 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
2,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
158,682 |
|
|
|
155,274 |
|
|
|
158,621 |
|
|
|
152,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Debt securities convertible into approximately 25.4 million shares and stock options exercisable
into approximately 27.6 million shares were outstanding but not included in the computation of
earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as their effect would have been
anti-dilutive. Debt securities convertible into approximately 25.4 million shares and stock options
exercisable into approximately 26.4 million shares were outstanding but not included in the
computation of earnings per share for the nine months ended June 30, 2005 as their effect would
have been anti-dilutive.
Debt securities convertible into approximately 25.4 million shares, stock options exercisable into
approximately 19.3 million shares, and a warrant to purchase approximately 1.0 million shares were
outstanding but not included in the computation of earnings per share for the three months ended
June 30, 2004 as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Debt securities convertible into
approximately 25.4 million shares, stock options exercisable into approximately 16.3 million
shares, and a warrant to purchase approximately 1.0 million shares were outstanding but not
included in the computation of earnings per share for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 as their
effect would have been anti-dilutive.
NOTE 9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company applies the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related Interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans.
Therefore, compensation cost is not generally required to be recognized in the financial statements
for the Companys stock options issued to employees. No stock-based employee compensation
cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under the Companys stock-based employee
compensation plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock
on the date of grant.
As previously discussed, the Company will be required to apply SFAS No. 123(R) in the reporting
period starting October 1, 2005. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that the compensation cost relating to
share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net income per share if the Company
had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, to stock-based compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts): |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Reported net income |
|
$ |
7,389 |
|
|
$ |
3,030 |
|
|
$ |
22,550 |
|
|
$ |
7,781 |
|
Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related
tax effects |
|
|
7,207 |
|
|
|
6,022 |
|
|
|
21,130 |
|
|
|
13,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income (loss) |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
7,008 |
|
|
$ |
1,420 |
|
|
$ |
(5,916 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported income |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related
tax effects |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported income |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related
tax effects |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
For purposes of pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123, the estimated fair value of the
options is assumed to be amortized to expense over the options vesting period. The fair value of
the options granted has been estimated at the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
91 |
% |
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected option life (years) |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
NOTE 10. CONTINGENCIES
From time to time various lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been, and may in the future be,
instituted or asserted against Skyworks, including those pertaining to patent infringement,
intellectual property, environmental, product liability, safety and health, employment and
contractual matters. In addition, in connection with the Merger, Skyworks has assumed
responsibility for all then current and future litigation (including environmental and intellectual
property proceedings) against Conexant or its subsidiaries in respect of the operations of
Conexants wireless business. The outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty and
some lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be disposed of unfavorably to Skyworks. Intellectual
property disputes often have a risk of injunctive relief which, if imposed against Skyworks, could
materially and adversely affect the financial condition or results of operations of Skyworks.
Additionally, the semiconductor industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of
intellectual property rights. From time to time, third parties have asserted and may in the future
assert patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies that are
important to our business and have demanded and may in the future demand that we license their
technology. The Company recently settled on favorable terms its litigation, which had been ongoing
since December 4, 2003, with Qualcomm Incorporated (Qualcomm) regarding claims of infringement of
each companys respective intellectual property rights. The financial and business details of the
settlement are confidential pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreements with Qualcomm.
NOTE 11. GUARANTEES AND INDEMNITIES
The Company does not currently have any guarantees. The Company generally indemnifies its
customers from third-party intellectual property infringement litigation claims related to its
products. In connection with certain facility leases, the Company has indemnified its lessors for
certain claims arising from the facility or the lease. The Company indemnifies its directors and
officers to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the state of Delaware. The duration of
the indemnities varies, and in many cases is indefinite. The indemnities to customers in connection
with product sales generally are subject to limits based upon the amount of the related product
sales and in many cases are subject to geographic and other restrictions. In certain instances, the
Companys indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments
the Company could be obligated to make. The Company has not recorded any liability for these
indemnities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
14
|
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
This report and other documents we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
are subject to the safe harbor created by those sections. Words such as believes, expects,
may, will, would, should, could, seek, intends, plans, potential, continue,
estimates, anticipates, predicts, and similar expressions or variations or negatives of such
words are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of
identifying forward-looking statements in this report. Additionally, statements concerning future
matters such as the development of new products, enhancements or technologies, sales levels,
expense levels and other statements regarding matters that are not historical are forward-looking
statements. Although forward-looking statements in this report reflect the good faith judgment of
our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us.
Consequently, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties and actual
results and outcomes may differ materially and adversely from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the forward-looking statements. A number of important factors could
cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those in the forward-looking
statements. We urge you to consider the risks and uncertainties discussed elsewhere in this report and in the other documents filed with
the SEC in evaluating our forward-looking statements. We have no plans, and undertake no
obligation, to revise or update our forward-looking statements to reflect any event or circumstance
that may arise after the date of this report. We caution readers not to place undue reliance upon
any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
In this document, the words we, our, ours and us refer only to Skyworks Solutions, Inc. and
not any other person or entity.
OVERVIEW
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (Skyworks or the Company) is a global leader in analog, mixed signal
and digital semiconductors for mobile communications applications. The Companys power amplifiers,
front-end modules, direct conversion transceivers and complete cellular system solutions are at the
heart of many of todays leading-edge multimedia handsets, cellular base stations, and wireless
networking platforms. Skyworks also offers a portfolio of highly innovative linear products,
supporting a diverse set of automotive, broadband, industrial and medical customers.
The wireless communications semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and is characterized by rapid
technological change, rapid product obsolescence and price erosion, evolving standards, short
product life cycles, and wide fluctuations in product supply and demand. Our operating results
have been, and our operating results may continue to be, negatively affected by substantial
quarterly and annual fluctuations and market downturns due to a number of factors, such as changes
in demand for end-user equipment, the timing of the receipt, reduction or cancellation of
significant customer orders, the gain or loss of significant customers, market acceptance of our
products and our customers products, our ability to develop, introduce and market new products and
technologies on a timely basis, availability and cost of products from suppliers, new product and
technology introductions by competitors, changes in the mix of products produced and sold,
intellectual property disputes, the timing and extent of product development costs, and general
economic conditions. In the past, average selling prices of established products have generally
declined over time and this trend is expected to continue in the future.
OUR STRATEGY
Skyworks vision is to become the premier supplier of wireless semiconductor solutions. Key
elements in our strategy include:
15
Leveraging Core Technologies
Skyworks deploys technology building blocks such as radio frequency integrated circuits,
analog/mixed-signal processing cores and digital baseband engines as well as software across
multiple product platforms. We believe that this approach creates economies of scale in research
and development and facilitates a reduction in the time to market for key products.
Increasing Integration Levels
High levels of integration enhance the benefits of our products by reducing production costs
through the use of fewer external components, reduced board space, and improved system assembly
yields. By combining all of the necessary communications functions for a complete system solution,
Skyworks can deliver additional semiconductor content, thereby offering existing and potential
customers more compelling and cost-effective solutions.
Capturing an Increasing Amount of Semiconductor Content
We enable our customers to start with individual components as necessary, and then migrate up the
product integration ladder. We believe that our highly integrated solutions will enable these
customers to speed their time to market while focusing their resources on product differentiation
through a broader range of more sophisticated, next-generation features.
Diversifying Customer Base
Skyworks supports virtually every wireless handset original equipment manufacturer (OEM)
including Nokia Corp., Motorola, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications
and LG Electronics, Inc. Additionally, we supply original design manufacturers (ODMs) such as
Arima, Inc., BenQ Corp., Chi Mei Enterprises, Inc., Compal Electronics, Inc., and Quanta as well as
emerging domestic handset suppliers throughout China. With the move to outsourcing to enable
increased OEM focus on brand and channel development, we believe we are particularly
well-positioned to address the growing needs of new market entrants and established suppliers alike
who seek RF and system-level integration expertise.
Delivering Operational Excellence
The Skyworks operations team leverages world-class manufacturing technologies and enables highly
integrated modules as well as system-level solutions. Skyworks will vertically integrate where it
can differentiate or will otherwise enter alliances and partnerships for leading-edge capabilities.
These partnerships and alliances are designed to ensure product leadership and competitive
advantage in the marketplace. We are focused on achieving the industrys shortest cycle times,
highest yields and ultimately the lowest cost structure.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004
The following table sets forth the results of our operations expressed as a percentage of net
revenues for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
60.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
GENERAL
During the nine months ended June 30, 2005, we strengthened operating results and generated
positive cash flows. More specifically, we:
|
|
|
experienced continued strong demand for our products resulting in an 8% increase in
units sold |
|
|
|
|
expanded on the success of our market leading front-end modules with an increase of over
100% in our Global Systems for Mobiles (GSM) front-end module units sold |
|
|
|
|
leveraged our strategy of higher integration to minimize our aggregate average selling price erosion to 1% |
|
|
|
|
experienced a 10% revenue increase in our core wireless markets |
NET REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
191,532 |
|
|
|
(7.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
207,377 |
|
|
$ |
602,197 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
$ |
565,956 |
|
We market and sell our semiconductor products and system solutions to leading OEMs of communication
electronics products, third-party ODMs and contract manufacturers and indirectly through electronic
components distributors.
During the three months ended June 30, 2005, we experienced a 12% aggregate decrease in the average
selling price of our products offset partially by a 5% increase in units sold, when compared
to the corresponding period in the previous fiscal year. The decrease in net
revenues for the quarter versus the same period last year is primarily due to lower tier three
customer purchases of cellular systems products, particularly in Europe, and the conclusion of
assembly and test services provided to Conexant under a supply agreement entered into at the time
of the Merger.
Net revenues increased for the nine months ended June 30, 2005 when compared to the corresponding
period in the previous fiscal year primarily as the result of increased demand for our wireless
product portfolio. During the nine months ended June 30, 2005, we experienced an 8% increase in
units sold and a 1% aggregate decrease in the average selling price of our products. The change in
the average selling price of our products for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2005 of 12%
and 1%, respectively, was largely due to changes in product mix. We experienced a shift in our
product mix to more highly integrated products which tempered the decrease in the average selling price
of our single function products of approximately 18%, when compared to the corresponding period in
the previous fiscal year. More specifically, we launched and ramped new highly integrated products
increasing our average selling prices primarily within our front-end module products. The increase
in net revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2005 when compared to the corresponding period
in the previous fiscal year was tempered by a decrease of approximately $16.0 million in net
revenues from Conexant for assembly and test services.
GROSS PROFIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
77,874 |
|
|
|
(7.1 |
)% |
|
$ |
83,784 |
|
|
$ |
238,492 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
$ |
225,556 |
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
40.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.4 |
% |
|
|
39.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.9 |
% |
17
Gross profit represents net revenues less cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold consists
primarily of purchased materials, labor and overhead (including depreciation) associated with
product manufacturing, royalty and other intellectual property costs and sustaining engineering
expenses pertaining to products sold.
Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues increased for the three months ended June 30, 2005
when compared to the corresponding period in the previous fiscal year primarily as the result of
increased operational efficiency, effective capacity utilization, and a shift to a higher margin
product mix. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues decreased slightly for the nine months
ended June 30, 2005 when compared to the corresponding period in the previous fiscal year primarily
as the result of additional costs we incurred earlier in the fiscal year as we launched and ramped
a number of more highly integrated product offerings and sub-optimal utilization of assets
associated with the decline in the assembly and test services provided to Conexant. We will
continue to focus on attaining further operational efficiencies and launching new, more highly
innovative products with higher average selling prices and gross margins.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
39,823 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
$ |
38,712 |
|
|
$ |
115,612 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
$ |
114,250 |
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
Research and development expenses consist principally of direct personnel costs, costs for
pre-production evaluation and testing of new devices and design and test tool costs.
Research and development expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased for the three months
ended June 30, 2005, when compared to the corresponding period in the previous fiscal year
primarily as a result of new product development within our focus areas of linear products and more
highly integrated solutions for our mobile applications. Research and development expenses
decreased as a percentage of net revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2005, when compared to
the corresponding period in the previous fiscal year as we realized the benefits of expense
reductions initiatives that were taken in the two preceding fiscal years. We are committed to
streamlining our processes and focusing our product development on integrated and differentiated
products to meet the needs of our customers.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
25,745 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
)% |
|
$ |
26,493 |
|
|
$ |
78,027 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
$ |
69,427 |
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses include personnel costs (legal, accounting, treasury,
human resources, information systems, customer service, etc.), sales representative commissions,
advertising and other marketing costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2005
when compared to the corresponding period in the previous fiscal year primarily as the result of
lower legal expenses as the Qualcomm litigation was settled. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased for the nine months ended June 30, 2005 when
compared to the corresponding period in the previous fiscal year primarily as the result of
additional direct selling expenses attributable to an increase in demand for our wireless product
portfolio. In addition, selling, general and
administrative expenses reflect increases in legal expenses related to protecting our intellectual
property portfolio. See Note 10 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for
information related to our contingencies.
18
SPECIAL CHARGES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
nm |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
nm |
|
$ |
15,759 |
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
ASSET IMPAIRMENTS
During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, we recorded a $13.2 million charge primarily related to
the impairment of obsolete baseband technology licenses that were established prior to the Merger.
This charge includes approximately $1.8 million of contractual payment obligations, which
substantially all amounts have been paid as of June 30, 2005. The impairment charge was based on a
recoverability analysis prepared by management based on the decision to discontinue certain
products and the related impact on its current and projected outlook. Management believed these
factors indicated that the carrying values of the related assets (intangible assets, machinery and
equipment) were impaired and that an impairment analysis should be performed. In performing the
analysis for recoverability, management estimated the future cash flows expected to result from
these products (salvage value). Since the estimated undiscounted cash flows were less than the
carrying value of the related assets, it was concluded that an impairment loss should be
recognized. In accordance with SFAS No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, the impairment charge was determined by comparing the estimated fair value of
the related assets to their carrying value. The write down established a new cost basis for the
impaired assets.
RESTRUCTURING
During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, we consolidated cellular systems software design centers
in an effort to improve our overall time to market for next generation multimedia systems
development. These actions aligned our structure with our current business environment. We
implemented reductions in force at two remote facilities and recorded restructuring charges of
approximately $2.6 million for costs related to severance benefits for affected employees and lease
obligations. Substantially all amounts accrued for these actions are expected to be paid within one
year.
See Note 5 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for activity and liability
balances related to our restructuring actions.
AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
|
(30.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
768 |
|
|
$ |
1,818 |
|
|
|
(21.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,306 |
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
In 2002, we recorded $36.4 million of intangible assets related to the Merger consisting of
developed technology, customer relationships and a trademark. These assets are principally being
amortized on a straight-line basis over a 10-year period. Amortization expense for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 primarily represents the amortization of these intangible
assets.
19
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
3,683 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,610 |
|
|
$ |
10,851 |
|
|
|
(24.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
14,386 |
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
The decrease in interest expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2005 when compared to the
corresponding period in the previous fiscal year is primarily related to the conversion of our $45
million of senior subordinated notes into shares of our common stock during the third quarter of
fiscal 2004.
See Note 4 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to our
borrowing arrangements.
OTHER INCOME, NET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
1,536 |
|
|
|
287.9 |
% |
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
3,724 |
|
|
|
223.5 |
% |
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Other income, net is comprised primarily of interest income on invested cash balances, foreign
exchange gains/losses and other non-operating income and expense items. The increase in other
income for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2005 when compared to the corresponding periods
in the previous fiscal year is primarily related to an increase in interest income on invested cash
balances and short-term investments of approximately $1.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively,
as a result of increases in interest rates and growth in our invested cash and short-term
investment balances.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
|
|
42.5% |
|
|
$ |
1,567 |
|
|
$ |
13,358 |
|
|
|
377.4% |
|
|
$ |
2,798 |
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
As a result of our history of operating losses and the expectation of future operating results, we
determined that it is more likely than not that historic income tax benefits will not be realized
except for certain future deductions associated with our foreign operations. Consequently, as of
June 30, 2005, we have maintained a valuation allowance against all of our net U.S. deferred tax
assets. Deferred tax assets have been recognized for foreign operations when management believes
they will be recovered during the carry forward period.
The provision for income taxes for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2005, consists of
approximately $0.0 and $3.4 million, respectively, of foreign income taxes incurred by foreign
operations. The provision for income taxes also principally includes $2.2 million of additional
foreign taxes for the nine months ended June 30, 2005 related to a change in the expected future
benefit of our deferred tax assets as the result of regulated reductions in the applicable tax
rates in Mexico. The foreign tax provision was reduced by a gain of
$0.3 million and $1.0 million for the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2005 from the translation of the long-term deferred tax asset
recorded in
20
Mexico. In addition, the provision for income taxes for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2005 consists of approximately $2.3 million and $9.5 million, respectively, of U.S. income taxes
recorded as a charge reducing the carrying value of goodwill. As noted in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2004, no benefit has been recognized for certain
pre-Merger deferred tax assets. The benefit from the recognition of these deferred items reduces
the carrying value of goodwill instead of a reduction of income tax expense. We will evaluate the
realization of the pre-Merger deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis and adjust the provision for
income taxes accordingly. As a result, the effective tax rate may vary in subsequent quarters.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2005, we reversed our policy of permanently reinvesting the
earnings of our Mexican subsidiary. We repatriated approximately $17.0 million of earnings, which
was not subject to Mexican withholding tax and could be applied against U.S. net operating loss
carryforwards resulting in no U.S. income tax. We provide for U.S. income tax currently on
earnings attributable to our operations in Mexico. No provision has been made for U.S. federal,
state, or additional foreign income taxes that would be due upon the actual or deemed distribution
of undistributed earnings of our other foreign subsidiaries, which have been or are intended to be
permanently reinvested.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
$ |
123,505 |
|
|
$ |
161,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
43,774 |
|
|
|
63,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(55,129 |
) |
|
|
(124,273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
4,790 |
|
|
|
10,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
116,940 |
|
|
$ |
111,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended June 30, 2005, we generated $43.8 million in cash reflecting net
income of $22.6 million, in addition to non-cash charges including depreciation, tax adjustments,
amortization and contribution of common shares to savings and retirement plans of $51.4 million.
This was offset by a reduction in liabilities of $23.9 million primarily related to payment of
prior year incentives and semi-annual interest, and an increase of $4.2 and $1.6 million in our net
accounts receivable and inventory balances respectively. For the nine months ended June 30, 2005,
we invested $27.6 million in capital equipment primarily related to the design of new highly
integrated products and processes, enabling us to address new opportunities and to meet our
customers demands. Our investments in capital equipment for the three and nine months ended June
30, 2005 were consistent with our guidance of returning to levels more comparable to fiscal 2003,
as provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2004. We
believe a focused program of capital expenditures will be required to sustain our current
manufacturing capabilities. We may also consider acquisition opportunities to extend our technology
portfolio and design expertise and to expand our product offerings. In addition, for the nine
months ended June 30, 2005, we made net investments of approximately $27.5 million in short-term
auction rate securities. Cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended June 30,
2005 primarily represents cash provided by stock option exercises.
Cash provided by operating activities was $63.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2004,
reflecting a net income of $7.8 million, non-cash charges, primarily depreciation, special charges,
amortization, and contribution of common shares to savings and retirement plans of $46.2 million
and a net decrease in the components of working capital of approximately $9.5 million.
21
Cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 consisted of $80.9
million of net investments in auction rate securities and capital expenditures of $43.4 million.
Cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 principally consisted
of approximately $8.3 million of net borrowings from Wachovia Bank, National Association under our
Facility Agreement, and $2.9 million of stock option exercises.
Based on our results of operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2005 and current trends, we
expect our existing sources of liquidity, together with cash expected to be generated from
operations, will be sufficient to fund our research and development, capital expenditures, debt
obligations, purchase obligations, working capital and other cash requirements for at least the
next twelve months. However, we cannot assure you that the capital required to fund these expenses
will be available in the future. In addition, any strategic investments and acquisitions that we
may make to help us grow our business may require additional capital resources. If we are unable to
obtain enough capital to meet our capital needs on a timely basis or at all, our business and
operations could be materially adversely affected.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist of operating leases. We lease certain facilities and
equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. The leases expire at various dates through 2010
and contain various provisions for rental adjustments. The leases generally contain renewal
provisions for varying periods of time.
CERTAIN BUSINESS RISKS
We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks, many of which are
beyond our control. This discussion highlights some of the risks which may affect our future
operating results. These are the risks and uncertainties we believe are most important for you to
consider. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, which we currently deem
immaterial or which are similar to those faced by other companies in our industry or business
in general, may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks or
uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition and operating results would likely
suffer.
We operate in the highly cyclical wireless communications semiconductor industry, which is subject
to significant downturns.
We operate primarily in the semiconductor industry, which is cyclical and subject to rapid change
and evolving industry standards. From time to time, changes in general economic conditions,
together with other factors, cause significant upturns and downturns in the industry. Periods of
industry downturn are characterized by diminished product demand, production overcapacity, excess
inventory levels and accelerated erosion of average selling prices. These characteristics, and in
particular their impact on the level of demand for digital cellular handsets, may cause substantial
fluctuations in our revenues and results of operations. Furthermore, downturns in the
semiconductor industry may be severe and prolonged, and any prolonged delay or failure of the
industry or the wireless communications market to recover from downturns would materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The semiconductor
industry also periodically experiences increased demand and production capacity constraints, which
may affect our ability to meet customer demand for our products. We have experienced these cyclical
fluctuations in our business and may experience cyclical fluctuations in the future.
We have incurred substantial operating losses in the past and may experience future losses.
Our operating results for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 were adversely affected by a global economic
slowdown, decreased consumer confidence, reduced capital spending, adverse business conditions and
liquidity concerns in the telecommunications and related industries. These factors led to a
slowdown in customer orders, an increase in the number of cancellations and reschedulings of
backlog, higher overhead costs as a percentage of our reduced net revenue, and an abrupt decline in
demand for many of the end-user products that incorporate our wireless communications semiconductor
products and system solutions. Although we emerged from this period of economic weakness in fiscal
2004, should economic conditions deteriorate for any reason, it could result in underutilization of
22
our manufacturing capacity, reduced revenues or changes in our revenue mix, and other impacts that
would materially and adversely affect our operating results. Due to this economic uncertainty, although
we were profitable in fiscal 2004, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sustain such
profitability or that we will not experience future operating losses.
Additionally, the conflict in Iraq, as well as other contemporary international conflicts, acts of
terrorism, and civil and military unrest contribute to the economic uncertainty. These continuing
and potentially escalating conflicts can also be expected to place continued pressure on economic
conditions in the United States and worldwide. These conditions make it extremely difficult for our
customers, our vendors and for us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities. If
such uncertainty continues or economic conditions worsen (or both), our business, financial
condition and results of operations will likely be materially and adversely affected.
The wireless semiconductor markets are characterized by intense competition.
The wireless communications semiconductor industry in general and the markets in which we compete
in particular are intensely competitive. We compete with U.S. and international semiconductor
manufacturers of all sizes in terms of resources and market share. We currently face significant
competition in our markets and expect that intense price and product competition will continue.
This competition has resulted in, and is expected to continue to result in, declining average
selling prices for our products and increased challenges in maintaining or increasing market share.
Furthermore, additional competitors may enter our markets as a result of growth opportunities in
communications electronics, the trend toward global expansion by foreign and domestic competitors,
and technological and public policy changes. We believe that the principal competitive factors for
semiconductor suppliers in our markets include, among others:
|
|
|
time to market; |
|
|
|
|
timely new product innovation; |
|
|
|
|
product quality, reliability and performance; |
|
|
|
|
product price; |
|
|
|
|
features available in products; |
|
|
|
|
compliance with industry standards; |
|
|
|
|
strategic relationships with customers; and |
|
|
|
|
access to and protection of intellectual property. |
We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully address these factors. Many of our
competitors enjoy the benefit of:
|
|
|
long presence in key markets; |
|
|
|
|
name recognition; |
|
|
|
|
high levels of customer satisfaction; |
|
|
|
|
ownership or control of key technology or intellectual property; and |
|
|
|
|
strong financial, sales and marketing, manufacturing, distribution, technical or other resources. |
As a result, certain competitors may be able to adapt more quickly than we can to new or emerging
technologies and changes in customer requirements or may be able to devote greater resources to the
development, promotion and sale of their products than we can.
Current and potential competitors have established or may in the future establish financial or
strategic relationships among themselves or with customers, resellers or other third parties. These
relationships may affect customers purchasing decisions. Accordingly, it is possible that new
competitors or alliances among competitors could emerge and rapidly acquire significant market
share. Furthermore, some of our customers have divisions that internally develop or manufacture
products similar to ours, and may compete with us. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
compete successfully against current and potential competitors. Increased competition could result
in pricing pressures, decreased gross margins and loss of market share and may materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
23
Our success depends upon our ability to develop new products and reduce costs in a timely manner.
The wireless communications semiconductor industry generally and, in particular, the markets into
which we sell our products are highly cyclical and characterized by constant and rapid
technological change, rapid product evolution, price erosion, evolving technical standards, short
product life cycles, increasing demand for higher levels of integration and miniaturization, and
wide fluctuations in product supply and demand. Our operating results depend largely on our ability
to continue to cost-effectively introduce new and enhanced products on a timely basis. The
successful development and commercialization of semiconductor devices, modules and system solutions
is highly complex and depends on numerous factors, including:
|
|
|
the ability to anticipate customer and market requirements and changes in technology and
industry standards; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain capacity sufficient to meet customer demand; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to define new products that meet customer and market requirements; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to complete development of new products and bring products to market on a timely basis; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to differentiate our products from offerings of our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
overall market acceptance of our products; and |
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain adequate intellectual property protection for our new products. |
Our ability to manufacture current products, and to develop new products, depends, among other
factors, on the viability and flexibility of our own internal information technology systems (IT
Systems). We upgrade and change our IT Systems from time to time, and are currently implementing a
system upgrade, and there can be no assurance that such upgrade will be successful.
We cannot assure you that we will have sufficient resources to make the substantial investment in
research and development needed to develop and bring to market new and enhanced products in a
timely manner. We will be required to continually evaluate expenditures for planned product
development and to choose among alternative technologies based on our expectations of future market
growth. We cannot assure you that we will be able to develop and introduce new or enhanced wireless
communications semiconductor products in a timely and cost-effective manner, that our products will
satisfy customer requirements or achieve market acceptance, or that we will be able to anticipate
new industry standards and technological changes. We also cannot assure you that we will be able to
respond successfully to new product announcements and introductions by competitors or to changes in
the design or specifications of complementary products of third parties with which our products
interface. If we fail to rapidly and cost-effectively introduce new and enhanced products in
sufficient quantities and that meet our customers requirements, our business and results of
operations would be materially and adversely harmed.
In addition, prices of many of our products decline, sometimes significantly, over time. We believe
that to remain competitive, we must continue to reduce the cost of producing and delivering
existing products at the same time that we develop and introduce new or enhanced products. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to reduce the cost of our products to remain
competitive.
The markets into which we sell our products are characterized by rapid technological change.
The demand for our products can change quickly and in ways we may not anticipate. Our markets
generally exhibit the following characteristics:
|
|
|
rapid technological developments and product evolution; |
|
|
|
|
rapid changes in customer requirements; |
|
|
|
|
frequent introduction of new or enhanced products; |
|
|
|
|
demand for higher levels of integration, decreased size and decreased power consumption; |
|
|
|
|
short product life cycles with declining prices over the life cycle of the product; and |
|
|
|
|
evolving industry standards. |
24
These changes in our markets may contribute to the obsolescence of our products. Our products could
become obsolete or less competitive sooner than anticipated because of a faster than anticipated
change in one or more of the above-noted factors.
The ability to attract and retain qualified personnel to contribute to the design, development,
manufacture and sale of our products is critical to our success.
As the source of our technological and product innovations, our key technical personnel represent a
significant asset. Our success depends on our ability to continue to attract, retain and motivate
qualified personnel, including executive officers and other key management and technical personnel.
The competition for management and technical personnel is intense in the semiconductor industry,
and therefore we cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and retain qualified management
and other personnel necessary for the design, development, manufacture and sale of our products. We
may have particular difficulty attracting and retaining key personnel during periods of poor
operating performance, given, among other things, the use of equity-based compensation by us and
our competitors. The loss of the services of one or more of our key employees or our inability to
attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our
ability to operate our business.
If OEMs and ODMs of communications electronics products do not design our products into their
equipment, we will have difficulty selling those products. Moreover, a design win from a customer
does not guarantee future sales to that customer.
Our products are not sold directly to the end-user, but are components or subsystems of other
products. As a result, we rely on OEMs and ODMs of wireless communications electronics products to
select our products from among alternative offerings to be designed into their equipment. Without
these design wins, we would have difficulty selling our products. If a manufacturer designs
another suppliers product into one of its product platforms, it is more difficult for us to
achieve future design wins with that platform because changing suppliers involves significant cost,
time, effort and risk on the part of that manufacturer. Also, achieving a design win with a
customer does not ensure that we will receive significant revenues from that customer. Even after a
design win, the customer is not obligated to purchase our products and can choose at any time to
reduce or cease use of our products, for example, if its own products are not commercially
successful, or for any other reason. We cannot assure you that we will continue to achieve design
wins or to convert design wins into actual sales, and any failure to do so could materially and
adversely affect our operating results.
Lengthy product development and sales cycles associated with many of our products may result in
significant expenditures before generating any revenues related to those products.
After our product has been developed, tested and manufactured, our customers may need three to six
months or longer to integrate, test and evaluate our product, and an additional three to six months
or more to begin volume production of equipment that incorporates the product. This lengthy cycle
time increases the possibility that a customer may decide to cancel or change product plans, which
could reduce or eliminate our sales to that customer. As a result of this lengthy sales cycle, we
may incur significant research and development expenses, and selling, general and administrative
expenses, before we generate the related revenues for these products. Furthermore, we may never
generate the anticipated revenues from a product after incurring such expenses if our customer
cancels or changes its product plans.
Uncertainties involving the ordering and shipment of our products could adversely affect our
business.
Our sales are typically made pursuant to individual purchase orders and not under long-term supply
arrangements with our customers. Our customers may cancel orders before shipment. Additionally, we
sell a portion of our products through distributors, some of whom have rights to return unsold
products. We may purchase and manufacture inventory based on estimates of customer demand for our
products, which is difficult to predict. This difficulty may be compounded when we sell to OEMs
indirectly through distributors or contract manufacturers, or both, as our forecasts of demand will
then be based on estimates provided by multiple parties. In addition, our customers may change
their inventory practices on short notice for any reason. The cancellation or deferral of product
orders, the return of previously sold products, or overproduction due to a change in anticipated
order volumes could result in us holding excess or obsolete inventory, which could result in
inventory write-downs and, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition.
25
Our reliance on a small number of customers for a large portion of our sales could have a material
adverse effect on the results of our operations.
A significant portion of our sales are concentrated among a limited number of customers. If we lost
one or more of these major customers, or if one or more major customers significantly decreased its
orders of our products, our business would be materially and adversely affected. Sales to our three
largest customers, including sales to their manufacturing subcontractors, represented approximately
37.3% of our net revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. We expect that our largest
customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our net revenue in fiscal 2005 and
for the foreseeable future. The identity of our largest customers and their respective
contributions to our net revenue have varied and will likely continue to vary from period to
period.
Average product life cycles in the semiconductor industry tend to be very short.
In the semiconductor industry, product life cycles tend to be short relative to the sales and
development cycles. Therefore, the resources devoted to product sales and marketing may not result
in material revenue, and from time to time we may need to write off excess or obsolete inventory.
If we were to incur significant marketing expenses and investments in inventory that we are not
able to recover, and we are not able to compensate for those expenses, our operating results would
be materially and adversely affected. In addition, if we sell our products at reduced prices in
anticipation of cost reductions but still hold higher cost products in inventory, our operating
results would be harmed.
Our leverage and our debt service obligations may adversely affect our cash flow.
On June 30, 2005, we had total indebtedness of approximately $280.0 million, which represented
approximately 28% of our total capitalization.
As long as our 4.75 percent convertible subordinated notes remain outstanding, we will have debt
service obligations on such notes of approximately $10,925,000 per year in interest payments. If we
issue other debt securities in the future, our debt service obligations will increase. If we are
unable to generate sufficient cash to meet these obligations and must instead use our existing cash
or investments, we may have to reduce or curtail other activities of our business.
We intend to fulfill our debt service obligations from cash expected to be generated by our
operations and from our existing cash and investments. If necessary, among other alternatives, we
may add lease lines of credit to finance capital expenditures and we may obtain other long-term
debt, lines of credit and other financing.
Our indebtedness could have significant negative consequences, including:
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing; |
|
|
|
|
requiring the dedication of a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations to
service our indebtedness, thereby reducing the amount of cash flow available for other
purposes, including capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and
the industry in which we compete; and |
|
|
|
|
placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage to less leveraged competitors and
competitors that have better access to capital resources. |
Despite our current debt levels, we are able to incur substantially more debt, which would increase
the risks described above.
26
We face a risk that capital needed for our business will not be available when we need it.
We may need to obtain sources of financing in the future. We expect our existing sources of
liquidity, together with cash expected to be generated from operations, will be sufficient to fund
our research and development, capital expenditures, debt obligations, purchase obligations, working
capital and other cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, we cannot assure
you that the capital required to fund these expenses will be available in the future. To the extent
that existing cash and securities and cash from operations are insufficient to fund our future
activities, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt
financing. Conditions existing in the U.S. capital markets if and when we seek additional financing
as well as the then current condition of the Company will affect our ability to raise capital, as
well as the terms of any such financing. We may not be able to raise enough capital to meet our
capital needs on a timely basis or at all. Failure to obtain capital when required would have a
material adverse effect on the Company.
In addition, any strategic investments and acquisitions that we may make to help us grow our
business may require additional capital resources. We cannot assure you that the capital required
to fund these investments and acquisitions will be available in the future.
Our manufacturing processes are extremely complex and specialized.
Our manufacturing operations are complex and subject to disruption, including for causes beyond our
control. The fabrication of integrated circuits is an extremely complex and precise process
consisting of hundreds of separate steps. It requires production in a highly controlled, clean
environment. Minor impurities, contamination of the clean room environment, errors in any step of
the fabrication process, defects in the masks used to print circuits on a wafer, defects in
equipment or materials, human error, or a number of other factors can cause a substantial
percentage of wafers to be rejected or numerous die on each wafer to malfunction. Because our
operating results are highly dependent upon our ability to produce integrated circuits at
acceptable manufacturing yields, these factors could have a material adverse affect on our
business. In addition, we may discover from time to time defects in our products after they have
been shipped, which may require us to pay warranty claims, replace products, or pay costs
associated with the recall of a customers products containing our parts.
Additionally, our operations may be affected by lengthy or recurring disruptions of operations at
any of our production facilities or those of our subcontractors. These disruptions may include
electrical power outages, fire, earthquake, flooding, war, acts of terrorism, health advisories or
risks, or other natural or man-made disasters. Disruptions of our manufacturing operations could
cause significant delays in shipments until we are able to shift the products from an affected
facility or subcontractor to another facility or subcontractor. In the event of such delays, we
cannot assure you that the required alternative capacity, particularly wafer production capacity,
would be available on a timely basis or at all. Even if alternative wafer production or assembly
and test capacity is available, we may not be able to obtain it on favorable terms, which could
result in higher costs and/or a loss of customers. We may be unable to obtain sufficient
manufacturing capacity to meet demand, either at our own facilities or through external
manufacturing or similar arrangements with others.
Due to the highly specialized nature of the gallium arsenide integrated circuit manufacturing
process, in the event of a disruption at the Newbury Park, California or Woburn, Massachusetts
semiconductor wafer fabrication facilities, alternative gallium arsenide production capacity would
not be immediately available from third-party sources. These disruptions could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to maintain and improve manufacturing yields that contribute positively to our
gross margin and profitability.
Minor deviations or perturbations in the manufacturing process can cause substantial manufacturing
yield loss, and in some cases, cause production to be suspended. Manufacturing yields for new
products initially tend to be lower as we complete product development and commence volume
manufacturing, and typically increase as we bring the product to full production. Our forward
product pricing includes this assumption of improving manufacturing yields and, as a result,
material variances between projected and actual manufacturing yields will have a direct effect on
our gross margin and profitability. The difficulty of accurately forecasting manufacturing yields
and maintaining cost competitiveness through improving manufacturing yields will continue to be
magnified by the increasing process
27
complexity of manufacturing semiconductor products. Our
manufacturing operations will also face pressures arising from the compression of product life
cycles, which will require us to manufacture new products faster and for shorter
periods while maintaining acceptable manufacturing yields and quality without, in many cases,
reaching the longer-term, high-volume manufacturing conducive to higher manufacturing yields and
declining costs.
We are dependent upon third parties for the manufacture, assembly and test of our products.
We rely upon independent wafer fabrication facilities, called foundries, to provide silicon-based
products and to supplement our gallium arsenide wafer manufacturing capacity. We also utilize
subcontractors to package, assemble and test our products. There are significant risks associated
with reliance on third-party foundries, including:
|
|
|
the lack of ensured wafer supply, potential wafer shortages and higher wafer prices; |
|
|
|
|
limited control over delivery schedules, manufacturing yields, production costs and
quality assurance; and |
|
|
|
|
the inaccessibility of, or delays in obtaining access to, key process technologies. |
Although we have long-term supply arrangements to obtain additional external manufacturing
capacity, the third-party foundries we use may allocate their limited capacity to the production
requirements of other customers. If we choose to use a new foundry, it will typically take an
extended period of time to complete the qualification process before we can begin shipping products
from the new foundry. The foundries may experience financial difficulties, be unable to deliver
products to us in a timely manner or suffer damage or destruction to their facilities, particularly
since some of them are located in earthquake zones. If any disruption of manufacturing capacity
occurs, we may not have alternative manufacturing sources immediately available. We may therefore
experience difficulties or delays in securing an adequate supply of our products, which could
impair our ability to meet our customers needs and have a material adverse effect on our operating
results.
We are dependent upon third parties for the supply of raw materials and components.
Our manufacturing operations depend on obtaining adequate supplies of raw materials and the
components used in our manufacturing processes. We believe we have adequate sources for the supply
of raw materials and components for our manufacturing needs with suppliers located around the
world. We cannot assure you that we will not lose a significant or sole supplier or that a supplier
will be able to meet performance and quality specifications or delivery schedules. If we lost a
supplier or a supplier were unable to meet performance or quality specifications or delivery
schedules, our ability to satisfy customer obligations could be materially and adversely affected.
In addition, we review our relationships with suppliers of raw materials and components for our
manufacturing needs on an ongoing basis. In connection with our ongoing review, we may modify or
terminate our relationship with one or more suppliers. We may also enter into other sole supplier
arrangements to meet certain of our raw material or component needs. While we do not typically rely
on a single source of supply for our raw materials, we are currently dependent on a sole-source
supplier for epitaxial wafers used in the gallium arsenide semiconductor manufacturing processes at
our manufacturing facilities. If we were to enter into additional sole supplier arrangements for
any of our raw materials or components, the risks associated with our supply arrangements would be
exacerbated.
Remaining competitive in the semiconductor industry requires transitioning to smaller geometry
process technologies and achieving higher levels of design integration.
In order to remain competitive, we expect to continue to transition our semiconductor products to
increasingly smaller line width geometries. This transition requires us to modify the manufacturing
processes for our products, design new products to more stringent standards, and to redesign some
existing products. In the past, we have experienced some difficulties migrating to smaller geometry
process technologies or new manufacturing processes, which resulted in sub-optimal manufacturing
yields, delays in product deliveries and increased expenses. We may face similar difficulties,
delays and expenses as we continue to transition our products to smaller geometry processes in the
future. In some instances, we depend on our relationships with our foundries to transition to
smaller geometry processes successfully. We cannot assure you that our foundries will be able to
effectively manage the transition or that we will be able to maintain our foundry relationships. If
our foundries or we experience significant delays in this transition or fail to efficiently
implement this transition, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected. As smaller geometry processes become more prevalent, we expect
to continue to integrate greater levels of functionality, as well as customer and third party
intellectual property, into our products. However, we may not be able to achieve higher levels of
design integration or deliver new integrated products on a timely basis, or at all.
28
We are subject to the risks of doing business internationally.
A substantial majority of our net revenues are derived from customers located outside the United
States, primarily countries located in the Asia-Pacific region and Europe. In addition, we have
design centers and suppliers located outside the United States, and third-party packaging, assembly
and test facilities and foundries located in the Asia-Pacific region. Finally, we have our own
packaging, assembly and test facility in Mexicali, Mexico. Our international sales and operations
are subject to a number of risks inherent in selling and operating abroad. These include, but are
not limited to, risks regarding:
|
|
|
currency exchange rate fluctuations; |
|
|
|
|
local economic and political conditions, including social, economic and political instability; |
|
|
|
|
disruptions of capital and trading markets; |
|
|
|
|
restrictive governmental actions (such as restrictions on transfer of funds, travel, and
trade protection measures, including export duties, quotas, customs duties, import or
export controls and tariffs); |
|
|
|
|
changes in legal or regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters, acts of terrorism, widespread illness and war; |
|
|
|
|
limitations on the repatriation of funds; |
|
|
|
|
difficulty in obtaining distribution and support; |
|
|
|
|
cultural differences in the conduct of business; |
|
|
|
|
the laws and policies of the United States and other countries affecting trade, foreign
investment and loans, and import or export licensing requirements; |
|
|
|
|
tax laws; |
|
|
|
|
the possibility of being exposed to legal proceedings in a foreign jurisdiction; and |
|
|
|
|
limitations on our ability under local laws to protect or enforce our intellectual
property rights in a particular foreign jurisdiction. |
Additionally, we are subject to risks in certain global markets in which wireless operators provide
subsidies on handset sales to their customers. Increases in handset prices that negatively impact
handset sales can result from changes in regulatory policies or other factors, which could impact
the demand for our products. Limitations or changes in policy on phone subsidies in South Korea,
Japan, China and other countries may have additional negative impacts on our revenues.
Our operating results may be adversely affected by substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations
and market downturns.
Our revenues, earnings and other operating results have fluctuated in the past and our revenues,
earnings and other operating results may fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations are due to a
number of factors, many of which are beyond our control.
These factors include, among others:
|
|
|
changes in end-user demand for the products (principally digital cellular handsets)
manufactured and sold by our customers; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of competitive pricing pressures, including decreases in average selling
prices of our products; |
|
|
|
|
production capacity levels and fluctuations in manufacturing yields; |
|
|
|
|
availability and cost of products from our suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
the gain or loss of significant customers; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop, introduce and market new products and technologies on a timely basis; |
|
|
|
|
new product and technology introductions by competitors; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the mix of products produced and sold; |
|
|
|
|
market acceptance of our products and our customers; |
|
|
|
|
intellectual property disputes; |
29
The foregoing factors are difficult to forecast, and these, as well as other factors, could
materially and adversely affect our quarterly or annual operating results. If our operating results
fail to meet the expectations of analysts or investors, it could materially and adversely affect
the price of our common stock.
Global economic conditions that impact the wireless communications industry could negatively affect
our revenues and operating results.
Global economic weakness can have wide-ranging effects on markets that we serve, particularly
wireless communications equipment manufacturers and network operators. Although the wireless
communications industry has recovered somewhat from an industry-wide recession, such recovery may
not continue. In addition, we cannot predict what effects negative events, such as war or other
international conflicts, may have on the economy or the wireless communications industry. The
continued threat of terrorism and heightened security and military action in response to this
threat, or any future acts of terrorism, may cause further disruptions to the global economy and to
the wireless communications industry and create further uncertainties. Further, a continued
economic recovery may not benefit us in the near term. If it does not, our ability to increase or
maintain our revenues and operating results may be impaired.
Our gallium arsenide semiconductors may cease to be competitive with silicon alternatives.
Among our product portfolio, we manufacture and sell gallium arsenide semiconductor devices and
components, principally power amplifiers and switches. The production of gallium arsenide
integrated circuits is more costly than the production of silicon circuits. The cost differential
is due to higher costs of raw materials for gallium arsenide and higher unit costs associated with
smaller sized wafers and lower production volumes. Therefore, to remain competitive, we must offer
gallium arsenide products that provide superior performance over their silicon-based counterparts.
If we do not continue to offer products that provide sufficiently superior performance to justify
the cost differential, our operating results may be materially and adversely affected. We expect
the costs of producing gallium arsenide devices will continue to exceed the costs of producing
their silicon counterparts. Silicon semiconductor technologies are widely-used process technologies
for certain integrated circuits and these technologies continue to improve in performance. We
cannot assure you that we will continue to identify products and markets that require performance
attributes of gallium arsenide solutions.
We may be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights, or demands
that we license third-party technology, which could result in significant expense and prevent us
from using our technology.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual
property rights. From time to time, third parties have asserted and may in the future assert
patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies that are
important to our business and have demanded and may in the future demand that we license their
technology or refrain from using it.
Any litigation to determine the validity of claims that our products infringe or may infringe
intellectual property rights of another, including claims arising from our contractual
indemnification of our customers, regardless of their merit or resolution, could be costly and
divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel. Regardless of the
merits of any specific claim, we cannot assure you that we would prevail in litigation because of
the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in intellectual property litigation. If
litigation were to result in an adverse ruling, we could be required to:
|
|
|
pay substantial damages; |
|
|
|
|
cease the manufacture, import, use, sale or offer for sale of infringing products or processes; |
|
|
|
|
discontinue the use of infringing technology; |
|
|
|
|
expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology; and |
|
|
|
|
license technology from the third party claiming infringement, which license may not be
available on commercially reasonable terms. |
We cannot assure you that our operating results or financial condition will not be materially
adversely affected if we were required to do any one or more of the foregoing items.
30
Many of our products incorporate technology licensed or acquired from third parties.
We sell products in markets that are characterized by rapid technological changes, evolving
industry standards, frequent new product introductions, short product life cycles, and increasing
levels of integration. Our ability to keep pace with this market depends on our ability to obtain
technology from third parties on commercially reasonable terms to allow our products to remain in a
competitive posture. If licenses to such technology are not available on commercially reasonable
terms and conditions, and we cannot otherwise integrate such technology, our products or our
customers products could become unmarketable or obsolete, and we could lose market share. In such
instances, we could also incur substantial unanticipated costs or scheduling delays to develop
substitute technology to deliver competitive products.
If we are not successful in protecting our intellectual property rights, it may harm our ability to
compete.
We rely on patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property laws, as well
as nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary
technologies, information, data, devices, algorithms and processes. In addition, we often
incorporate the intellectual property of our customers, suppliers or other third parties into our
designs, and we have obligations with respect to the non-use and non-disclosure of such third-party
intellectual property. In the future, it may be necessary to engage in litigation or like
activities to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets or to
determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights of others, including our customers. This
could require us to expend significant resources and to divert the efforts and attention of our
management and technical personnel from our business operations. We cannot assure you that:
|
|
|
the steps we take to prevent misappropriation, infringement, dilution or other violation
of our intellectual property or the intellectual property of our customers, suppliers or
other third parties will be successful; |
|
|
|
|
any existing or future patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets or other
intellectual property rights or ours will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented;
or |
|
|
|
|
any of the measures described above would provide meaningful protection. |
Despite these precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use
our technology without authorization, develop similar technology independently or design around our
patents. If any of our intellectual property protection mechanisms fails to protect our technology,
it would make it easier for our competitors to offer similar products, potentially resulting in
loss of market share and price erosion. Even if we receive a patent, the patent claims may not be
broad enough to adequately protect our technology. Furthermore, even if we receive patent
protection in the United States, we may not seek, or may not be granted, patent protection in
foreign countries. In addition, effective patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protection
may be unavailable or limited for certain technologies and in certain foreign countries.
There is a growing industry trend to include or adapt open source software that is generally made
available to the public by its developers, authors or third parties. Often such software includes
license provisions requiring public disclosure of any derivative works containing open source
code. There is little legal precedent in the area of open source software or its effects on
copyright law or the protection of proprietary works. We take steps to avoid the use of open source
works in our proprietary software, and are taking steps to limit our suppliers from doing so.
However, in the event a copyright holder were to demonstrate in court that we have not complied
with a software license, we may be required to cease production or distribution of that work or to
publicly disclose the source code for our proprietary software, which may negatively affect our
operations or stock price.
We attempt to control access to and distribution of our proprietary information through
operational, technological and legal safeguards. Despite our efforts, parties, including former or
current employees, may attempt to copy, disclose or obtain access to our information without our
authorization. Furthermore, attempts by computer hackers to gain unauthorized access to our systems
or information could result in our proprietary information being compromised or interrupt our
operations. While we attempt to prevent such unauthorized access we may be unable to anticipate the
methods used, or be unable to prevent the release of our proprietary information.
31
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to effect suitable investments, alliances and
acquisitions, and to integrate companies we acquire.
Although we have in the past and intend to continue to invest significant resources in internal
research and development activities, the complexity and rapidity of technological changes and the
significant expense of internal research and development make it impractical for us to pursue
development of all technological solutions on our own. On an ongoing basis, we intend to review
investment, alliance and acquisition prospects that would complement our product offerings, augment
our market coverage, or enhance our technological capabilities. However, we cannot assure you that
we will be able to identify and consummate suitable investment, alliance or acquisition
transactions in the future. Moreover, if we consummate such transactions, they could result in:
|
|
|
issuances of equity securities dilutive to our stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
large one-time write-offs; |
|
|
|
|
the incurrence of substantial debt and assumption of unknown liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of key employees from the acquired company; |
|
|
|
|
amortization expenses related to intangible assets; and |
|
|
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from other business concerns. |
Moreover, integrating acquired organizations and their products and services may be difficult,
expensive, time-consuming and a strain on our resources and our relationship with employees and
customers and ultimately may not be successful. Additionally, in periods following an acquisition,
we will be required to evaluate goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets for impairment.
When such assets are found to be impaired, they will be written down to estimated fair value, with
a charge against earnings. For instance, we recorded a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle in fiscal 2003 in the amount of $397.1 million as a result of the goodwill obtained in
connection with the Merger.
Certain provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law may make it difficult for
someone to acquire control of us.
We have certain anti-takeover measures that may affect our common stock. Our certificate of
incorporation, our by-laws and the Delaware General Corporation Law contain several provisions that
would make more difficult an acquisition of control of us in a transaction not approved by our
Board of Directors. Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws include provisions such as:
|
|
|
the division of our Board of Directors into three classes to be elected on a staggered
basis, one class each year; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of our Board of Directors to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more
series without further authorization of stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent; |
|
|
|
|
elimination of the right of stockholders to call a special meeting of stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that stockholders provide advance notice of any stockholder nominations of
directors or any proposal of new business to be considered at any meeting of stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3 percent of our shares be
obtained to amend or repeal any provision of our by-laws or the provision of our
certificate of incorporation relating to amendments to our by-laws; |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that the affirmative vote of at least 80 percent of our shares be obtained
to amend or repeal the provisions of our certificate of incorporation relating to the
election and removal of directors, the classified board or the right to act by written
consent; |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that the affirmative vote of at least 80 percent of our shares be obtained
for business combinations unless approved by a majority of the members of the Board of
Directors and, in the event that the other party to the business combination is the
beneficial owner of 5 percent or more of our shares, a majority of the members of Board of
Directors in office prior to the time such other party became the beneficial owner of 5
percent or more of our shares; |
|
|
|
|
a fair price provision; and |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that the affirmative vote of at least 90 percent of our shares be obtained
to amend or repeal the fair price provision. |
32
In addition to the provisions in our certificate of incorporation and by-laws, Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law generally provides that a corporation shall not engage in any
business combination with any interested stockholder during the three-year period following the
time that such stockholder becomes an interested
stockholder, unless a majority of the directors then in office approves either the business
combination or the transaction that results in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder
or specified stockholder approval requirements are met.
Increasingly stringent environmental laws, rules and regulations may require us to redesign our
existing products and processes, and could adversely affect our ability to cost-effectively produce
our products.
The semiconductor and electronics industries have been subject to increasing environmental
regulations. A number of domestic and foreign jurisdictions seek to restrict the use of various
substances, a number of which have been used in our products or processes. For example, the
European Union Restriction of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS)
Directive requires that certain substances be removed from all electronics components by July 1,
2006. Removing such substances requires the expenditure of additional research and development
funds to seek alternative substances, as well as increased testing by third-parties to ensure the
quality of our products and compliance with the RoHS Directive. Alternative substances may not be
readily available or commercially feasible, may only be available from a single source, or may be
significantly more expensive than their restricted counterparts. While we have implemented a
compliance program to ensure our product offering meets these regulations, if we are unable to
complete the transition in a timely manner, or ensure consistent quality and product yields with
redesigned processes, our operations may be adversely affected.
We may be liable for penalties under environmental laws, rules and regulations, which could
adversely impact our business.
We have used, and will continue to use, a variety of chemicals and compounds in manufacturing
operations and have been and will continue to be subject to a wide range of environmental
protection regulations in the United States and in foreign countries. We cannot assure you that
current or future regulation of the materials necessary for our products would not have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Environmental
regulations often require parties to fund remedial action for violations of such regulations
regardless of fault. Consequently, it is often difficult to estimate the future impact of
environmental matters, including potential liabilities. Furthermore, our customers increasingly
require warranties or indemnity relating to compliance with environmental regulations. We cannot
assure you that the amount of expense and capital expenditures that might be required to satisfy
environmental liabilities, to complete remedial actions and to continue to comply with applicable
environmental laws will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Our stock price has been volatile and may fluctuate in the future. Accordingly, you might not be
able to sell your shares of common stock at or above the price you paid for them.
The trading price of our common stock has and may continue to fluctuate significantly. Such
fluctuations may be influenced by many factors, including:
|
|
|
our performance and prospects; |
|
|
|
|
the performance and prospects of our major customers; |
|
|
|
|
announcements of new products and technological innovations by our customers, competitors or us; |
|
|
|
|
the depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
investor perception of us and the industry in which we operate; |
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or buy/sell recommendations by analysts; |
|
|
|
|
general financial and other market conditions; and |
|
|
|
|
domestic and international economic conditions. |
Public stock markets have recently experienced extreme price and trading volume volatility,
particularly in the technology sectors of the market. This volatility has significantly affected
the market prices of securities of many technology companies for reasons frequently unrelated to or
disproportionately impacted by the operating performance of these companies. These broad market
fluctuations may materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
33
In addition, fluctuations in our stock price, volume of shares traded, and our price-to-earnings
multiple may have made our stock attractive to momentum, hedge or day-trading investors who often
shift funds into and out of stocks rapidly, exacerbating price fluctuations in either direction,
particularly when viewed on a quarterly basis. Our company has been, and in the future may be, the
subject of commentary by financial news media. Such commentary may contribute to volatility in our
stock price. If our operating results do not meet the expectations of securities analysts or
investors, our stock price may decline, possibly substantially over a short period of time.
Accordingly, you may not be able to resell your shares of common stock at or above the price you
paid.
Changes in the accounting treatment of stock options will adversely affect our results of
operations.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment to require companies to expense employee stock options for financial reporting purposes,
effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Such stock option expensing
will require us to value our employee stock option grants pursuant to an option valuation formula
and amortize that value against our earnings over the vesting period in effect for those options.
We currently account for stock-based awards to employees in accordance with Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and have adopted the
disclosure-only alternative of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. In April
2005, the SEC issued a rule amending the compliance date which allows companies to implement SFAS
No. 123(R) at the beginning of their next fiscal year, instead of the next reporting period, that
begins after June 15, 2005. As a result, we will implement SFAS No. 123(R) in the reporting period
starting October 1, 2005. When we are required to expense employee stock options in the future,
this change in accounting treatment could materially and adversely affect our reported results of
operations as the stock-based compensation expense would be charged directly against our reported
earnings. For an illustration of the effect of using the fair-value-based method of accounting for
share-based payment transactions on our recent results of operations, see Note 9 of Notes to
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We have exposure to foreign exchange and interest rate risk. There have been no material
changes in market risk exposures from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended October 1, 2004.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President
and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under
the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report (the Evaluation
Date). Based upon that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective in timely alerting them to the material information relating to us (or our consolidated
subsidiaries) required to be included in our periodic SEC filings. In designing and evaluating the
disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives, and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
There were no significant changes made in our internal control over financial reporting during the
fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
34
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
31.a
|
|
Certification of CEO Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) * |
|
|
|
31.b
|
|
Certification of CFO Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) * |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 * |
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 10, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ David J. Aldrich |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Aldrich |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Allan M. Kline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allan M. Kline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
31.a
|
|
Certification of CEO Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) |
|
|
|
31.b
|
|
Certification of CFO Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
37
exv31wa
Exhibit 31.a
CERTIFICATION
I, David J. Aldrich, President and Chief Executive Officer of Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (the
Company), certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
c) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
third fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 10, 2005 |
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ David J. Aldrich |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Aldrich President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv31wb
Exhibit 31.b
CERTIFICATION
I, Allan M. Kline, Chief Financial Officer of Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (the Company),
certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
c) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
third fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 10, 2005 |
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Allan M. Kline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allan M. Kline Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv32
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending July 1, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Aldrich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
/s/ David J. Aldrich
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Aldrich
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
August 10, 2005 |
|
|
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending July 1, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Allan M. Kline, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
/s/ Allan M. Kline
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allan M. Kline
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
August 10, 2005 |
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.