Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC. | ||||
| | | | |
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | ||||
| | | | |
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) | ||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
| | | | |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
| | | | |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
| | | | |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
| | | | |
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
| | | | |
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
| | | | |
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
| | | | |
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
| | | | |
(4) | Date Filed: |
|||
| | | | |
![]() |
March 27, 2020
Dear Stockholder:
I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) of Skyworks Solutions, Inc., to be held at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, on Wednesday, May 6, 2020. The Annual Meeting will be held online due to the emerging public health impact of the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) and to support the health and well-being of our partners, employees, and stockholders. You will be able to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWKS2020, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions, and vote. In light of the public health and safety concerns related to COVID-19, we believe that hosting a virtual meeting will enable greater stockholder attendance and participation from any location around the world. We intend to resume our historical practice of holding an in-person meeting next year. We look forward to your participation online or by proxy. The attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describe the matters that we expect to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online, and regardless of how many shares you own, it is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, if you are a stockholder of record, we urge you to complete the proxy and return it to us promptly in the postage-prepaid envelope provided, or to complete and submit your proxy by telephone or via the Internet in accordance with the instructions on the proxy card. If your shares are held in street name, that is, held for your account by a broker or other nominee, you will receive instructions from the holder of record that you must follow for your shares to be voted. If you do attend the Annual Meeting online and wish to vote at that time, you may revoke a previously submitted proxy by voting at the meeting.
Sincerely yours,
David J. Aldrich
Chairman of the Board
Page 7
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders To Be Held on Wednesday, May 6, 2020 |
To the Stockholders of Skyworks Solutions, Inc.:
The 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) of Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (the Company), will be held on Wednesday, May 6, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. The Annual Meeting will be held online, accessed through the site www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWKS2020, to consider and act upon the following proposals:
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 12, 2020, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. To ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, we urge you to submit a proxy promptly in one of the following ways whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online: (a) by completing, signing, and dating the proxy card and returning it in the postage-prepaid envelope provided for that purpose; (b) by completing and submitting your proxy using the toll-free telephone number listed on the proxy card; or (c) by completing and submitting your proxy via the Internet by visiting the website address listed on the proxy card. The Proxy Statement accompanying this notice describes each of the items of business listed above in more detail. Our Board of Directors recommends: a vote FOR the election of the nominees for director named in Proposal 1 of the Proxy Statement; a vote FOR Proposal 2, ratifying the selection of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for fiscal year 2020; a vote FOR Proposal 3, approving, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Companys named executive officers; a vote FOR Proposal 4, approving the amendment to the Companys 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended; a vote FOR each of Proposals 58, approving amendments to the Companys Restated Certificate of Incorporation; and a vote AGAINST Proposal 9, a non-binding stockholder proposal.
The accompanying Proxy Statement includes further information about how to attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares online during the Annual Meeting, and submit questions online during the Annual Meeting. A complete list of registered stockholders will be available for examination during the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWKS2020.
By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||
![]() Robert J. Terry Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Page 8
Proxy Statement 2020
Proxy Statement 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders |
Table of Contents |
Page 10
Proxy Statement Summary |
This summary highlights information generally contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider in advance of the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and we encourage you to read the entire Proxy Statement before voting your shares.
2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Date & Time |
Virtual Meeting Access |
Record Date |
||
May 6, 2020 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time |
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWKS2020 | March 12, 2020 |
Matters to be Voted Upon
|
Your vote is very important to us. Please cast your vote on all of the proposals to ensure that your shares are represented.
Proxy Statement | Page 11
General Information |
How do we refer to Skyworks in this Proxy Statement?
The terms Skyworks, the Company, we, us, and our refer to Skyworks Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries.
When and where is our Annual Meeting?
The Companys 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) will be held on Wednesday, May 6, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. The Annual Meeting will be held online due to the emerging public health impact of the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) and to support the health and well-being of our partners, employees, and stockholders. You will be able to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWKS2020. In light of the public health and safety concerns related to COVID-19, we believe that hosting a virtual meeting will facilitate stockholder attendance and participation at our Annual Meeting by enabling stockholders to participate remotely from any location around the world. We have designed the virtual Annual Meeting to provide the same rights and opportunities to participate as stockholders would have at an in-person meeting, including the right to vote and ask questions through the virtual meeting platform. We intend to return to holding an in-person annual meeting in 2021.
What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will consider and vote on the following matters:
The stockholders will also act on any other business that may properly come before the meeting.
What is included in our proxy materials?
The Companys Annual Report, which includes financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2019 (fiscal year 2019), accompanies this Proxy Statement. This Proxy Statement and form of proxy, and/or notice of access thereto, are being first mailed to stockholders on or about March 27, 2020. The Proxy Statement and the Companys Annual Report are available at www.skyworksinc.com/annualreport.
Page 12 | Proxy Statement
Who can vote at our Annual Meeting?
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 12, 2020 (the Record Date), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 169,562,821 shares of Skyworks common stock issued and outstanding. Pursuant to Skyworks Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws, and applicable Delaware law, each share of common stock entitles the holder of record at the close of business on the Record Date to one vote on each matter considered at the Annual Meeting.
Is my vote important?
Yes. Your vote is important no matter how many shares you own. Please take the time to vote in the way that is easiest and most convenient for you, and cast your vote as soon as possible.
How do I vote if I am a stockholder of record?
As a stockholder of record, you may vote in one of the following three ways whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online: (a) by completing, signing, and dating the proxy card and returning it in the postage-prepaid envelope provided for that purpose, (b) by completing and submitting your proxy using the toll-free telephone number listed on the proxy card, or (c) by completing and submitting your proxy via the Internet at the website address listed on the proxy card. If you attend the Annual Meeting online, you may vote online at the Annual Meeting even if you have previously submitted your proxy by mail or telephone, or via the Internet (and your vote at the Annual Meeting will automatically revoke your previously submitted proxy, although mere virtual attendance at the meeting without voting will not have that result).
How do I vote if I am a beneficial owner of shares held in street name?
If your shares are held on your behalf by a third party such as your broker or another person or entity who holds shares of the Company on your behalf and for your benefit, which person or entity we refer to as a
nominee, and your broker (or other nominee) is the stockholder of record of such shares, then you are the beneficial owner of such shares and we refer to those shares as being held in street name. As the beneficial owner of your street name shares, you are entitled to instruct your broker (or other nominee) as to how to vote your shares. Your broker (or other nominee) will provide you with information regarding how to instruct your broker (or other nominee) as to the voting of your street name shares.
How do I vote if I am a participant in the Skyworks 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan?
If you are a participant in the Skyworks 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan (the 401(k) Plan), you will receive an instruction card for the Skyworks shares you own through the 401(k) Plan. That instruction card will serve as a voting instruction card for the trustee of the 401(k) Plan, and your 401(k) Plan shares will be voted as you instruct.
Can I change my vote after I have voted?
Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting. Proxies may be revoked by (a) delivering to the Secretary of the Company, before the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting, a written notice of revocation bearing a later date than the proxy, (b) duly completing a later-dated proxy relating to the same shares and delivering it to the Secretary of the Company before the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting, or (c) attending the Annual Meeting online and voting (although virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of a proxy). Any written notice of revocation or subsequent proxy should be delivered to the Companys executive offices at Skyworks Solutions, Inc., 5221 California Avenue, Irvine, CA 92617, Attention: Secretary, before the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting. If you vote your shares over the Internet prior to the Annual Meeting, only your latest Internet vote submitted prior to the Annual Meeting will be counted at the Annual Meeting.
Proxy Statement | Page 13
How do I virtually attend the Annual Meeting?
You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWKS2020, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions, and vote. The meeting will begin at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. In order to participate in the meeting, you will need the multi-digit number included in your proxy card, voter instruction form, or notice. Instructions on how to attend and participate online, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, will be posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWKS2020.
Online check-in will begin at 1:45 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 6, 2020, and you should allow ample time for the online check-in proceedings. We will have technicians standing by and ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the virtual meeting starting at 1:45 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 6, 2020. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in time or meeting time, please call the phone number that will be listed at that time at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWKS2020.
If I vote by proxy, how will my vote be cast?
The persons named as attorneys-in-fact in this Proxy Statement, Liam K. Griffin and Robert J. Terry, were selected by the Board of Directors and are officers of the Company. As attorneys-in-fact, Messrs. Griffin and Terry will vote any shares represented at the meeting by proxy. Each executed proxy card returned by a stockholder of record or proxy vote recorded via telephone or the Internet by a stockholder of record in the manner provided on the proxy card prior to the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting will be voted. Where a choice has been specified in an executed proxy with respect to the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted in accordance with the choices specified.
How will my shares be voted if I do not give specific voting instructions when I deliver my proxy?
If you are a stockholder of record and deliver a proxy but do not give specific voting instructions, then the proxy holders will vote your shares as recommended by the Board of Directors.
If your shares are held in street name, your broker (or other nominee) is required to vote those shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not give instructions to your broker (or other nominee), your broker (or other nominee) will only be entitled to vote your shares with respect to discretionary matters, as described below, but will not be permitted to vote the shares with respect to non-discretionary matters. If you beneficially own shares that are held in street name by your broker (or other nominee), we strongly encourage you to provide instructions to your broker (or other nominee) as to how to vote on the election of directors and all of the Proposals by signing, dating, and returning to your broker (or other nominee) the instruction card provided by your broker (or other nominee).
If you are a participant in the 401(k) Plan, the trustee of the 401(k) Plan will not vote your 401(k) Plan shares if the trustee does not receive voting instructions from you by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 1, 2020, unless otherwise required by law.
What is a broker non-vote?
A broker non-vote occurs when your broker (or other nominee) submits a proxy for your shares (because the broker (or other nominee) has either received instructions from you on one or more proposals, but not all, or has not received instructions from you but is entitled to vote on a particular discretionary matter) but does not indicate a vote FOR a particular proposal because the broker (or other nominee) either does not have authority to vote on that proposal and has not received voting instructions from you or has discretionary authority on the proposal but chooses not to exercise it. Broker non-votes are not counted to determine the number of votes present for the particular proposal, nor are
Page 14 | Proxy Statement
they counted as votes FOR or AGAINST the proposal in question or as abstentions, except for Proposals 5, 6, 7, and 8 regarding the approval of amendments to the Companys Restated Certificate of Incorporation, for which broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes AGAINST such proposals. We count broker non-votes for the purpose of determining a quorum for the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in street name by your broker (or other nominee), please check the instruction card provided by your broker (or other nominee) or contact your broker (or other nominee) to determine whether you will be able to vote by telephone or via the Internet.
What vote is required for each matter?
Election of Directors. Pursuant to the Companys By-laws, a nominee will be elected to the Board of Directors if the votes cast FOR the nominees election at the Annual Meeting exceed the votes cast AGAINST the nominees election (as long as the only director nominees are those individuals set forth in this Proxy Statement). Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as votes FOR or AGAINST. If the shares you own are held in street name, your broker (or other nominee), as the record holder of your shares, is required to vote your shares according to your instructions. Proposal 1 is not considered to be a discretionary matter for certain brokers. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote with respect to this item, your broker may not vote your shares with respect to the election of directors. In such case, a broker non-vote may occur, which will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 1.
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present, or represented by proxy, at the Annual Meeting, and entitled to vote on such matter at the Annual Meeting, is required to approve Proposal 2. Proposal 2 involves a matter on which a broker (or other nominee) does have discretionary authority to vote. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote with respect to this item, your broker may still vote
your shares with respect to this proposal in its discretion. With respect to Proposal 2, a vote of ABSTAIN will have the same effect as a vote of AGAINST.
Say-on-Pay Vote; Approval of 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended; Stockholder Proposal. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present online, or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, and entitled to vote on such matter at the Annual Meeting, is required to approve Proposals 3, 4, and 9. Proposals 3, 4, and 9 are not considered to be discretionary matters for certain brokers. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote with respect to these items, your broker may not vote your shares with respect to these proposals. In such case, a broker non-vote may occur, which will have no effect on the outcome of Proposals 3, 4, and 9. Votes that are marked ABSTAIN are counted as present and entitled to vote with respect to Proposals 3, 4, and 9 and will have the same impact as a vote that is marked AGAINST for purposes of Proposals 3, 4, and 9.
Approval of Amendments to the Companys Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Approval of Proposals 5, 6, 7, and 8 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least the following percentages of the shares of our outstanding common stock, respectively: 80%, 90%, 80%, and 80%. Proposals 5-8 are not considered to be discretionary matters for certain brokers. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote with respect to one or more of these items, your broker may not vote your shares with respect to such proposals. In such case, a broker non-vote may occur, which will have the same effect as a vote that is marked AGAINST for purposes of such proposal. Votes that are marked ABSTAIN as to any of Proposals 5-8 are counted as present and entitled to vote with respect to such proposal and will have the same impact as a vote that is marked AGAINST for purposes of such proposal.
Proxy Statement | Page 15
How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote:
FOR the election of each of the nine director nominees (Proposal 1).
FOR the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020 (Proposal 2).
FOR the approval, on a non-binding basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as described below under Compensation Discussion and Analysis, and in the executive compensation tables and accompanying narrative disclosures (Proposal 3).
FOR the approval of an amendment to the Companys 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended (Proposal 4).
FOR the approval of amendments to the Companys Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Proposals 5-8).
AGAINST the approval, on a non-binding basis, of a stockholder proposal regarding a right by stockholders to act by written consent (Proposal 9).
How will the votes cast at our Annual Meeting be counted?
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., and our independent inspector of elections will tabulate the votes at the Annual Meeting. The vote on each matter submitted to stockholders will be tabulated separately.
Where can I find the voting results of our Annual Meeting?
We expect to announce the preliminary voting results at our Annual Meeting. The final voting results will be reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K that will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) within four business days after the end of our Annual Meeting and will be posted on our website.
Will my vote be kept confidential?
Yes. We will keep your vote confidential unless (1) we are required by law to disclose your vote (including in connection with the pursuit or defense of a legal or
administrative action or proceeding), or (2) there is a contested election for the Board of Directors. The inspector of elections will forward any written comments that you make on the proxy card to management without providing your name, unless you expressly request on your proxy card that your name be disclosed.
What is the quorum requirement for our Annual Meeting?
The holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding stock of the Company present either in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Shares present virtually during the Annual Meeting will be considered shares of common stock represented in person at the meeting. Shares that abstain from voting on any proposal and broker non-votes will be counted as shares that are present for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the Annual Meeting. If a broker non-vote occurs with respect to any shares of the Companys common stock on any matter, then those shares will be treated as not present and not entitled to vote with respect to that matter (even though those shares are considered entitled to vote for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists because they are entitled to vote on other matters) and will not be voted.
How do I submit a question at the Annual Meeting?
If you wish to submit a question, beginning at 1:45 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 6, 2020, you may log into the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWKS2020, type your question into the Ask a Question field, and click Submit. Our virtual meeting will be governed by our Annual Meeting Rules of Conduct which will include rules on permissible topics for stockholder questions and will be posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWKS2020.
When will Skyworks next hold an advisory vote on the frequency of say-on-pay votes?
Skyworks currently conducts an annual say-on-pay vote. The next advisory vote on the frequency of say-on-pay votes is expected to be held at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Page 16 | Proxy Statement
What is householding?
Some brokers (or other nominees) may be participating in the practice of householding proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report may have been sent to multiple stockholders in your household. If you are a stockholder and your household or address has received only one Annual Report and one Proxy Statement, the Company will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Annual Report and the Proxy Statement to you, upon your written request to Skyworks Solutions, Inc., 5221 California Avenue, Irvine, CA 92617, Attention: Investor Relations, or oral request to Investor Relations
at (949) 231-3433. If you would like to receive separate copies of our Annual Report and Proxy Statement in the future, you should direct such request to your broker (or other nominee). Even if your household or address has received only one Annual Report and one Proxy Statement, a separate proxy card should have been provided for each stockholder account. Each individual proxy card should be signed, dated, and returned in the postage-prepaid envelope (or completed and submitted by telephone or via the Internet, as described on the proxy card). If your household has received multiple copies of our Annual Report and Proxy Statement, you can request the delivery of single copies in the future by contacting your broker (or other nominee), or the Company at the address or telephone number above.
Proxy Statement | Page 17
Election of Directors |
Under this Proposal 1, you are being asked to consider nine nominees for election to our Board of Directors to serve until the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. The names of the nine nominees for election as directors, their current occupations, the year such nominees were first elected as directors of the Company and their Board committee memberships are set forth in the table below. Each nominee for election has agreed to serve if elected, and the Board of Directors knows of no reason why any nominee should be unable or unwilling to serve. If a nominee is unable or unwilling to serve, the attorneys-in-fact named in this Proxy Statement will vote any shares represented at the meeting by proxy for the election of another individual nominated by the Board of Directors, if any. No nominee or executive officer is
related by blood, marriage, or adoption to any other director, nominee, or executive officer. No arrangements or understandings exist between any director or person nominated for election as a director and any other person pursuant to which such person is to be selected as a director or nominee for election as a director.
Balakrishnan S. Iyer, age 63, the current chairman of the Audit Committee, has served as a director since 2002 and is not a director nominee up for reelection at the Annual Meeting. As a result, the number of directors constituting the Board of Directors will be reduced from ten (10) to nine (9) effective upon the election of directors at the Annual Meeting. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of individuals than the number of nominees named in this Proxy Statement.
Director Nominees | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Director | Committee Memberships | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Occupation | Since | Independent | AC | CC | NCGC | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
David J. Aldrich Chairman of the Board, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. |
2000 | | | | | |||||||||
Alan S. Batey Retired Executive Vice President and President of N. A., General Motors |
2019 | · | · | |||||||||||
|
Kevin L. Beebe President and Chief Executive Officer, 2BPartners, LLC |
2004 | · | | | C | ||||||||
Timothy R. Furey Chief Executive Officer, MarketBridge |
1998 | · | · | · | ||||||||||
|
Liam K. Griffin President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
2016 | | | | | ||||||||
Christine King Lead Independent Director, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. Retired Executive Chairman, QLogic Corporation |
2014 | · | · | C | ||||||||||
|
David P. McGlade Chairman of the Board, Intelsat S.A. |
2005 | · | · | · | | ||||||||
Robert A. Schriesheim Chairman, Truax Partners LLC |
2006 | · | · | · | ||||||||||
|
Kimberly S. Stevenson Senior Vice President and General Manager, NetApp, Inc. |
2018 | · | | | · | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AC indicates Audit Committee, CC indicates Compensation Committee, NCGC indicates Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and C indicates Committee Chair |
Page 18 | Proxy Statement
Immediately below this proposal is biographical information about each of the director nominees, including information regarding each nominees business experience for the past five years, and the names of other public companies for which each nominee has served as a director during the past five years. The information presented below regarding the specific experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills of each nominee led our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Board of Directors to conclude that he or she should serve as a director.
Majority Vote Standard for Election of Directors
A nominee for election as a director in an uncontested election (an election where the number of nominees for election as directors is equal to or less than the number of directors to be elected) will be elected if the number of votes cast FOR such nominees election exceeds the number of votes cast AGAINST the nominees election. In a contested election (in which the number of nominees for election as directors exceeds the number of directors to be elected at such meeting), directors are elected by a plurality of all votes cast in such election. The election of directors at this Annual Meeting is uncontested. As a result, each nominee for election as a director at the Annual Meeting will only be elected if the votes cast FOR such nominee exceed the number of votes cast
AGAINST such nominee. As required by our corporate governance guidelines, which are available on the Investor Relations portion of the Companys website at www.skyworksinc.com, each incumbent director who is a nominee for election as a director at the Annual Meeting submitted to the Board of Directors an irrevocable resignation that would become effective if the votes cast FOR such nominees election do not exceed the votes cast AGAINST such nominees election and our Board of Directors determines to accept his or her resignation. Upon such resignation by a nominee and pursuant to the procedures set forth in the corporate governance guidelines, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate the best interests of our Company and stockholders and will recommend to our Board of Directors the action to be taken with respect to the resignation. The Board of Directors will then decide whether to accept, reject, or modify the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees recommendation, and the Company will publicly disclose such decision by the Board of Directors with respect to the director nominee.
Shares represented by all proxies received by the Board of Directors that are properly completed, but do not specify a choice as to the election of directors, will be voted FOR the election of all nine of the nominees.
Proxy Statement | Page 19
Nominees for Election |
David J. Aldrich Chairman of the Board |
||||
Director since: 2000 Age: 63 Committee(s): None |
||||
| | | | |
Mr. Aldrich serves as Chairman of the Board, a position he has held since May 2014. Mr. Aldrich also served as Executive Chairman of the Company from May 2016 to May 2018, Chief Executive Officer from May 2014 to May 2016, and as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director from April 2000 to May 2014. From September 1999 to April 2000, Mr. Aldrich served as President and Chief Operating Officer. From May 1999 to September 1999, he served as Executive Vice President, and from May 1996 to May 1999, he served as Vice President and General
Manager of the semiconductor products business unit. Mr. Aldrich joined the Company in 1995 as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.
We believe that Mr. Aldrichs qualifications to serve as a director include his leadership experience, his strategic decision-making ability, his knowledge of the semiconductor industry, and his in-depth knowledge of Skyworks business.
| | |
Christine King Lead Independent Director |
||||
Director since: 2014 Age: 70 Committee(s): Audit, Compensation (Chair) |
||||
| | | | |
Ms. King has been Lead Independent Director since May 2019. Ms. King served as Executive Chairman of QLogic Corporation (a publicly traded developer of high-performance server and storage networking connectivity products) from August 2015 until August 2016, when it was acquired by Cavium, Inc. Previously, she served as a director and as Chief Executive Officer of Standard Microsystems Corporation (a publicly traded developer of silicon-based integrated circuits utilizing analog and mixed-signal technologies) from 2008 until the companys acquisition in 2012 by Microchip Technology, Inc. Prior to Standard
Microsystems, Ms. King was Chief Executive Officer of AMI Semiconductor, Inc., a publicly traded company, from 2001 until it was acquired by ON Semiconductor Corp. in 2008.
We believe that Ms. Kings qualifications to serve as a director include her extensive management and operational experience in the high-tech and semiconductor industries as well as her significant strategic and financial expertise.
Page 20 | Proxy Statement
Liam K. Griffin President and Chief Executive Officer |
||||
Director since: 2016 Age: 53 Committee(s): None |
||||
| | | | |
Prior to his appointment as Chief Executive Officer and to the Board of Directors in May 2016, Mr. Griffin had served as President of the Company since May 2014. He served as Executive Vice President and Corporate General Manager from November 2012 to May 2014, Executive Vice President and General Manager, High Performance Analog from May 2011 to November 2012, and Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing from August 2001 to May 2011. Previously, Mr. Griffin was employed by Vectron International, a division of Dover Corp., as Vice President of
Worldwide Sales from 1997 to 2001 and as Vice President of North American Sales from 1995 to 1997.
We believe that Mr. Griffins qualifications to serve as a director include his strong relationships with Skyworks key customers, investors, employees, and other stakeholders, as well as a deep understanding of the semiconductor industry and its competitive landscape gained through serving in several different executive positions at Skyworks.
| | |
Alan S. Batey |
||||
Director since: 2019 Age: 57 Committee(s): Nominating and Corporate Governance |
||||
| | | | |
Mr. Batey served as Executive Vice President and President of North America for General Motors Company (a publicly traded automotive manufacturer), as well as the Global Brand Chief for Chevrolet, a division of General Motors Company, from 2014 until 2019. His career spans more than 39 years with General Motors where he held various senior management positions in operations, marketing, and sales around the world.
We believe that Mr. Bateys qualifications to serve as a director include his extensive senior management experience at General Motors, where he developed expertise on a broad set of complex strategic, operational, and technological matters involving the automotive industry, an industry that is expected to be a growth market for the Company. Mr. Batey was identified as a director candidate by a search firm engaged by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Proxy Statement | Page 21
Kevin L. Beebe |
||||
Director since: 2004 Age: 61 Committee(s): Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair) |
||||
| | | | |
Mr. Beebe has been President and Chief Executive Officer of 2BPartners, LLC (a partnership that provides strategic, financial, and operational advice to private equity investors and management) since 2007. In 2014, Mr. Beebe became a founding partner of Astra Capital Management (a private equity firm based in Washington, D.C.). Previously, beginning in 1998, he was Group President of Operations at ALLTEL Corporation (a telecommunications services company).
We believe that Mr. Beebes qualifications to serve as a director include his two decades of experience as an operating executive in the wireless telecommunications industry as well as his experience and relationships gained from advising leading private equity firms that are transacting business in the global capital markets.
| | |
Timothy R. Furey |
||||
Director since: 1998 Age: 61 Committee(s): Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance |
||||
| | | | |
Mr. Furey has been Chief Executive Officer of MarketBridge (a privately owned digital marketing software and services firm) since 1991. MarketBridge provides digital marketing, predictive analytics, and sales effectiveness solutions to clients that include Fortune 1000 companies in the software, communications, financial services, life sciences, and consumer products sectors. Mr. Furey also serves as Managing Partner of the Technology Marketing Group (which advises and invests in emerging growth
companies in the social media, mobile, and marketing automation markets).
We believe that Mr. Fureys qualifications to serve as a director include his experience as Chief Executive Officer of MarketBridge, as well as his engagements with MarketBridges clients (many of which are Fortune 1000 companies), which provide him with a broad range of knowledge regarding business operations and growth strategies.
Page 22 | Proxy Statement
David P. McGlade |
||||
Director since: 2005 Age: 59 Committee(s): Audit, Compensation |
||||
| | | | |
Mr. McGlade serves as Chairman of the Board of Intelsat S.A. (a publicly traded worldwide provider of satellite communication services), a position he has held since April 2013. Mr. McGlade served as Executive Chairman of Intelsat from April 2015 to March 2018, prior to which he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. McGlade joined Intelsat in April 2005 and was the Deputy Chairman of Intelsat from August 2008 until April 2013. Previously, Mr. McGlade served as an Executive Director of mmO2 PLC and as the Chief Executive
Officer of O2 UK (a subsidiary of mmO2), a position he held from October 2000 until March 2005.
We believe that Mr. McGlades qualifications to serve as a director include his significant operational, strategic, and financial acumen, as well as his knowledge about global capital markets, developed over his 30 years of experience in the telecommunications business.
| | |
Robert A. Schriesheim |
||||
Director since: 2006 Age: 59 Committee(s): Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance |
||||
| | | | |
Mr. Schriesheim currently serves as chairman of Truax Partners LLC (a consulting firm). He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sears Holdings Corporation (a publicly traded nationwide retailer) from August 2011 to October 2016. From January 2010 to October 2010, Mr. Schriesheim was Chief Financial Officer of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (a global human resources consulting and outsourcing company that was acquired by Aon Corporation). From October 2006 until December 2009, he was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Lawson Software, Inc. (a publicly traded ERP software provider).
We believe that Mr. Schriesheims qualifications to serve as a director include his extensive knowledge of the capital markets and corporate financial capital structures, his expertise evaluating and structuring merger and acquisition transactions within the technology sector, and his experience gained through leading companies through major strategic and financial corporate transformations.
Proxy Statement | Page 23
Kimberly S. Stevenson |
||||
Director since: 2018 Age: 57 Committee(s): Nominating and Corporate Governance |
||||
| | | | |
In January 2020, Ms. Stevenson became Senior Vice President and General Manager, Foundational Data Services Business Unit, at NetApp, Inc. (a publicly traded provider of cloud data services). From February 2019 to January 2020, she was a venture partner at RIDGE-LANE Limited Partners (a strategic advisory and venture development firm). Previously, Ms. Stevenson served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Data Center Products and Solutions, at Lenovo Group Ltd. (a publicly traded manufacturer of personal computers, data center equipment, smartphones, and tablets) from May 2017 to October 2018. From September 2009 to February 2017, she served as a Corporate Vice President at Intel Corporation (a publicly traded semiconductor designer and manufacturer), holding various positions including
Chief Operating Officer for the Client and Internet of Things Businesses and Systems Architecture Group from September 2016 to February 2017, Chief Information Officer from February 2012 to August 2016, and General Manager, IT Operations and Services, from September 2009 to January 2012.
We believe that Ms. Stevensons qualifications to serve as a director include her extensive senior management experience in the semiconductor and technology industries and her expertise on best practices within information systems and operational risk management.
Page 24 | Proxy Statement
Nine of our currently serving directors have been nominated for election to our Board of Directors to serve until the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. The table below summarizes the key qualifications and attributes
relied upon by the Board of Directors in nominating our current directors for election. Marks indicate specific areas of focus or expertise relied on by the Board of Directors. The lack of a mark in a particular area does not necessarily signify a directors lack of qualification or experience in such area.
In addition to the information presented above regarding each directors specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board of Directors to conclude that he or she should serve as a director, we also believe that each of our directors has a reputation for integrity, honesty, and adherence
to high ethical standards. They have each demonstrated business acumen, an ability to exercise sound judgment, knowledge of our business and industry, and the willingness to devote the time needed to be an effective director.
Proxy Statement | Page 25
Corporate Governance |
Stockholder Engagement and Best Practices
The following actions and policies, some of which were adopted in recent years after receiving feedback from our stockholders, demonstrate the commitment of our Board of Directors to robust corporate governance and responsiveness to stockholders:
Because responsiveness to the Companys stockholders is a critical part of our commitment to corporate governance, we conduct outreach to our stockholders to understand their perspectives on various governance matters. Most recently, we engaged in formal stockholder outreach following the 2019 Annual Meeting at which our stockholders voted to approve a shareholder proposal requesting that the Board of Directors take steps to remove the supermajority provisions in the Companys Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, which we refer to as our Charter. Specifically, in addition to soliciting feedback from institutional stockholders on compensation-related topics related to the vote on our 2019 Say-on-Pay proposal, as discussed below under Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we solicited
investors input regarding whether the Board of Directors should reintroduce for stockholder vote four proposals that had previously been voted upon by stockholders in 2016 and would have eliminated all remaining supermajority voting provisions in the Charter, but had not received sufficient stockholder support. The majority of institutional stockholders with whom we spoke expressed their preference that the four proposals be reintroduced. The Board of Directors considered this input and decided to submit for stockholder vote at the Annual Meeting four proposals that would eliminate supermajority voting provisions in the Charter. In addition, as described further below, the Company has decided to engage in enhanced solicitation of stockholder votes for the Annual Meeting, with the objective of obtaining sufficient votes to approve the proposals.
Our Board of Directors values the opinions expressed by our stockholders and will continue to consider the voting results from stockholder meetings, as well as feedback obtained through our stockholder engagement efforts, when making future decisions regarding corporate governance matters.
The Board of Directors met five (5) times during fiscal year 2019. During fiscal year 2019, each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board of Directors on which he or she served. The Companys policy with respect to directors attendance at the Annual Meeting is included in our corporate governance guidelines, which are available on the Investor Relations portion of the Companys website at www.skyworksinc.com. At the 2019 Annual Meeting, each director then in office was in attendance, with the exception of Mr. Schriesheim.
Each year, the Board of Directors reviews the relationships that each director has with the Company
Page 26 | Proxy Statement
and with other parties. Only those directors who do not have any of the categorical relationships that preclude them from being independent within the meaning of the applicable Listing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (the Nasdaq Rules) and who the Board of Directors affirmatively determines have no relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, are considered to be independent directors. The Board of Directors has reviewed a number of factors to evaluate the independence of each of its members. These factors include its members current and historic relationships with the Company and its competitors, suppliers, and customers; their relationships with management and other directors; the relationships their current and former employers have with the Company; and the relationships between the Company and other companies of which a member of the Companys Board of Directors is a director or executive officer. After evaluating these factors, the Board of Directors has determined that a majority of the members of the Board of Directors, namely, Alan S. Batey, Kevin L. Beebe, Timothy R. Furey, Balakrishnan S. Iyer, Christine King, David P. McGlade, Robert A. Schriesheim, and Kimberly S. Stevenson, do not have any relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as directors and that each such director is an independent director of the Company within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Rules.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board of Directors has adopted corporate governance practices to help fulfill its responsibilities to the stockholders in overseeing the work of management and the Companys business results. These guidelines are intended to ensure that the Board of Directors has the necessary authority and practices in place to review and evaluate the Companys business operations, as needed, and to make decisions that are independent of the Companys management. In addition, the guidelines are intended to align the interests of directors and management with those of
the Companys stockholders. A copy of the Companys corporate governance guidelines is available on the Investor Relations portion of the Companys website at www.skyworksinc.com.
In accordance with these corporate governance guidelines, independent members of the Board of Directors of the Company met in executive session without management present four (4) times during fiscal year 2019. The Lead Independent Director served as presiding director for these meetings.
Our stockholders may communicate directly with the Board of Directors as a whole or to individual directors by letter addressed directly to such individual or individuals at the following address:
c/o
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
5221 California Avenue
Irvine, CA 92617
Attention: Secretary
The Company will forward to each director to whom such communication is addressed, and to the Chairman of the Board in his capacity as representative of the entire Board of Directors, any mail received at the Companys corporate office to the address specified by such director and the Chairman of the Board.
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers, and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. We make available our code of business conduct and ethics through our website at www.skyworksinc.com. We intend to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, our code of business conduct and ethics that are required to be publicly disclosed by posting any such amendment or waivers on our website pursuant to SEC requirements and Nasdaq Rules.
Proxy Statement | Page 27
Executive Officer and Director Stock Ownership Requirements
As described in detail below under Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we have adopted Executive Officer and Director Stock Ownership programs that require our executive officers (including those Named Executive Officers who are still currently serving as executive officers) and non-employee directors to hold a significant equity interest in Skyworks with the objective of more closely aligning the interests of our executive officers and directors with those of our stockholders. All of our Named Executive Officers and directors have met the stock ownership guidelines as of the date hereof (with the exception of Ms. Stevenson and Mr. Batey, who are not required to comply with the guidelines until the fifth anniversary of their respective appointment to the Board of Directors).
Our Board of Directors selects the Companys Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer in the manner it determines to be in the best interests of the Company. Mr. Aldrich, the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company, has served as the Chairman of the Board since May 2014 and, as noted above, is standing for reelection as a non-employee director at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Griffin was appointed by our Board of Directors in May 2016 to succeed Mr. Aldrich as Chief Executive Officer and also to serve as a director, and he is standing for reelection at the Annual Meeting. In May 2014, at the time of Mr. Aldrichs appointment as Chairman of the Board, our Board of Directors also first appointed an independent director within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Rules (see above under Director Independence) to serve as the Lead Independent Director. Ms. King was appointed in May 2019 to be the current Lead Independent Director and is standing for reelection at the Annual Meeting.
The duties of the Lead Independent Director, as set forth in our corporate governance guidelines, include the following:
The Board believes our current leadership structure is appropriate and that the duties of the Lead Independent Director appropriately and effectively complement the duties of the Chairman of the Board.
Page 28 | Proxy Statement
Committees of the Board of Directors |
The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
We have established an Audit Committee consisting of the following individuals, each of whom the Board of Directors has determined is independent within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Rules and meets the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act): Mr. Iyer (Chairman), Mr. Furey, Ms. King, and Mr. McGlade. As Mr. Iyer is not a director nominee up for reelection at the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors intends to appoint a new Audit Committee Chairman following the election of directors at the Annual Meeting.
The primary responsibility of the Audit Committee is the oversight of the quality and integrity of the Companys financial statements, the Companys internal financial and accounting processes, and the independent audit process. Additionally, the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and authority necessary to comply with Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee meets privately with the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews their performance and independence from management, and has the sole authority to retain and dismiss the independent registered public accounting firm. These and other aspects of the Audit Committees authority are more particularly described in the Companys Audit Committee Charter, which the Board of Directors adopted and is reviewed annually by the committee and is available on the Investor Relations portion of our website at www.skyworksinc.com.
The Audit Committee has adopted a formal policy concerning approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided to the Company by its independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP. The
policy requires that all services provided by KPMG LLP, including audit services and permitted audit-related and non-audit services, be preapproved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee preapproved all audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG LLP for fiscal year 2019. The Audit Committee met six (6) times during fiscal year 2019.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Iyer (Chairman), Ms. King, and Mr. McGlade meets the qualifications of an audit committee financial expert under SEC rules and the qualifications of financial sophistication under the applicable Nasdaq Rules, and qualifies as independent as defined under the applicable Nasdaq Rules.
We have established a Compensation Committee consisting of the following individuals, each of whom the Board of Directors has determined is independent within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Rules: Ms. King (Chairman), Mr. McGlade, and Mr. Schriesheim. The Compensation Committee met five (5) times during fiscal year 2019. The functions of the Compensation Committee include establishing the appropriate level of compensation, including short and long-term incentive compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, all other executive officers, and any other officers or employees who report directly to the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also administers Skyworks equity-based compensation plans. The Compensation Committees authority to grant equity awards to the Companys executive officers may not be delegated to the Companys management or others. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, and it is available on the Investor Relations portion of the Companys website at www.skyworksinc.com.
Proxy Statement | Page 29
The Compensation Committee has engaged Aon/Radford Consulting (Aon/Radford) to assist it in determining the components and amounts of executive compensation. The consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee, through its Chairman, and the Compensation Committee retains the right to terminate or replace the consultant at any time.
The process and procedures followed by the Compensation Committee in considering and determining executive and director compensation are described below under Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee
We have established a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consisting of the following individuals, each of whom the Board of Directors has determined is independent within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Rules: Mr. Beebe (Chairman), Mr. Batey, Mr. Furey, Mr. Schriesheim, and Ms. Stevenson. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four (4) times during fiscal year 2019. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating and recommending individuals for election or reelection to the Board of Directors and its committees, including any recommendations that may be submitted by stockholders, as well as the evaluation and recommendation of corporate governance policies. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the annual evaluation process for the Board of Directors, each committee, and individual directors, by soliciting from each director his or her assessment of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors, the committees on which he or she serves, and other individual directors. These and other aspects of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees authority are more particularly described in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, which the Board of Directors adopted and is available on the Investor Relations portion of the Companys website at www.skyworksinc.com.
Director Nomination Procedures
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates director candidates in the context of the overall composition and needs of the Board of Directors, with the objective of recommending a group that can best manage the business and affairs of the Company and represent the interests of the Companys stockholders using its diversity of experience. The committee seeks directors who possess certain minimum qualifications, including the following:
Page 30 | Proxy Statement
The committee believes that our Board of Directors, taken as a whole, should embody a diverse set of skills, experiences, and backgrounds in order to better inform its decisions. The committee considers age, tenure, gender, race, and ethnicity, in addition to business experience and other specific areas of focus or expertise, in its holistic approach to assessing and identifying director nominees. With respect to the recent director search that culminated with the appointment of Mr. Batey in August 2019, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee instructed its retained search firm to include candidates reflecting gender and ethnic diversity in the pool of potential director nominees to be considered by the committee. The committee will also take into account the fact that a majority of the Board of Directors must meet the independence requirements of the applicable Nasdaq Rules. The Company expects that a directors existing and future commitments will not materially interfere with such directors obligations to the Company. For candidates who are incumbent directors, the committee considers each directors past attendance at meetings and participation in and contributions to the activities of the Board of Directors. The committee identifies candidates for director nominees in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chairman of the Board, through the use of search firms or other advisors or through such other methods as the committee deems to be helpful to identify candidates. Once candidates have been identified, the committee confirms that the candidates meet all of the minimum qualifications for director nominees set forth above through interviews, background checks, or any other means that the committee deems to be helpful in the evaluation process. The committee then meets to discuss and evaluate the qualities and skills of each candidate, both on an individual basis and taking into account the overall composition and needs of the Board of Directors. Based on the results of the
evaluation process, the committee recommends candidates for director nominees for election to the Board of Directors.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders provided such stockholders follow the procedures set forth below. The committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates, including the criteria set forth above, based on whether the candidate was recommended by a stockholder or otherwise. Stockholders who wish to nominate director candidates for election at the 2021 Annual Meeting, but who are not to be included in the Companys proxy materials pursuant to the proxy access provisions in our By-laws, may do so in accordance with the provisions of our By-laws by submitting a written recommendation to the Secretary of the Company at the address below no earlier than the close of business on January 6, 2021, and no later than the close of business on February 5, 2021. In the event that the 2021 Annual Meeting is held more than thirty (30) days before or after the first anniversary of the Companys 2020 Annual Meeting, then the required notice must be delivered in writing to the Secretary of the Company at the address below no earlier than 120 days prior to the date of the 2021 Annual Meeting and no later than the later of 90 days prior to the 2021 Annual Meeting or the 10th day following the day on which the public announcement of the date of the 2021 Annual Meeting is first made by the Company. For nominees for election to the Board of Directors proposed by stockholders to be considered, the recommendation for nomination must be in writing and must include the following information:
Proxy Statement | Page 31
A stockholder (or a group of up to twenty stockholders) who has owned at least three percent of the Companys outstanding shares of common stock continuously for at least three years, and has complied with the other requirements in the Companys By-laws, may nominate and include in the Companys proxy materials a number of director nominees up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board of Directors. Written notice of a proxy access nomination
for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be submitted to the Secretary of the Company at the address below no earlier than the open of business on December 7, 2020, and no later than the close of business on January 6, 2021. In the event that the 2021 Annual Meeting is held more than thirty (30) days before, or more than sixty (60) days after, the first anniversary of the Companys 2020 Annual Meeting, then the required notice must be delivered in writing to the Secretary of the Company at the address below no earlier than 150 days prior to the date of the 2021 Annual Meeting and no later than the later of 120 days prior to the 2021 Annual Meeting or the 10th day following the day on which the public announcement of the date of the 2021 Annual Meeting is first made by the Company.
Written notice of proxy access nominations and written recommendations for nomination may be sent to the General Counsel and Secretary of the Company via U.S. mail or expedited delivery service to:
Skyworks
Solutions, Inc.
5221 California Avenue
Irvine, California 92617
Page 32 | Proxy Statement
Role of the Board of Directors in Risk Oversight |
Our Board of Directors oversees our risk management processes directly and through its committees. Our management team is responsible for risk management on a day-to-day basis. The role of our Board of Directors and its committees is to oversee the risk management activities of our management team. They fulfill this duty by discussing with management the policies and practices utilized by management in assessing and managing risks and providing input on those policies and practices. In general, our Board of Directors oversees risk management activities relating to business strategy, capital allocation, organizational structure, certain operational risks, and acquisitions; our Audit Committee oversees risk management activities related to financial controls, legal and compliance risks, and cybersecurity risk; our Compensation Committee oversees risk management activities relating to our compensation policies and practices as well as management succession planning; and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees risk management activities relating to Board composition. Each committee reports to the Board of Directors on a regular basis, including reports with respect to the committees risk oversight activities as appropriate. For example, the Board of Directors periodically reviews and approves the executive succession plan in consultation with the Compensation Committee and the Chief Executive Officer. In addition, since risk issues often overlap, committees from time to time request that the Board of Directors discuss particular risks.
Our Compensation Committee does not believe that any risks arising from our employee compensation policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. Our Compensation Committee believes that any such risks are mitigated by:
Proxy Statement | Page 33
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation |
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors currently consists of Ms. King (Chairman), Mr. McGlade, and Mr. Schriesheim. Mr. Beebe and Mr. Furey served on the Compensation Committee until January 30, 2019, when Mr. Schriesheim was appointed to the Compensation Committee. No member of this committee was at any time during fiscal year 2019 an officer or employee of the Company, was formerly an officer of the Company or
any of its subsidiaries, or had any employment relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries. No executive officer of the Company has served as a director or member of the compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director of or member of the Compensation Committee.
Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions |
Other than compensation agreements and other arrangements described below under Information About Executive and Director Compensation, since September 29, 2018, there has not been a transaction or series of related transactions to which the Company was or is a party involving an amount in excess of $120,000 and in which any director, executive officer, holder of more than five percent (5%) of any class of our voting securities, or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. In January 2008, the Board of Directors adopted a written related person transaction approval policy, which was amended in November 2018, and which sets forth the Companys policies and procedures for the review,
approval or ratification of any transaction required to be reported in its filings with the SEC. The Companys policy with regard to related person transactions is that all related person transactions between the Company and any related person (as defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K) or their affiliates, in which the amount involved is equal to or greater than $120,000, be reviewed by the Companys General Counsel and approved by the Audit Committee. In addition, the Companys Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires that employees discuss with the Companys Compliance Officer any significant relationship (or transaction) that might raise doubt about such employees ability to act in the best interest of the Company.
Page 34 | Proxy Statement
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
The Audit Committee has selected KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020 and has further directed that management submit the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. KPMG LLP was the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for fiscal year 2019, and has been the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company since 2002. We are asking the stockholders to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020.
Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to attend the Annual Meeting online. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate stockholder questions.
Stockholder ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm is not required by the Companys By-laws or other applicable legal requirements. However, the Audit Committee is submitting the selection of KPMG LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present online or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on such matter at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the selection of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. In the event stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee may reconsider this appointment. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the Companys and stockholders best interests.
Proxy Statement | Page 35
Audit Fees |
KPMG LLP provided audit services to the Company consisting of the annual audit of the Companys 2019 consolidated financial statements contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K and reviews
of the financial statements contained in the Companys Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for fiscal year 2019. The following table summarizes the fees of KPMG LLP billed to the Company for the last two fiscal years.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fee Category | Fiscal Year 2019 ($) |
% of Total (%) |
Fiscal Year 2018 ($) |
% of Total (%) |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Audit Fees(1) | 2,315,150 | 93.1 | 2,479,090 | 89.9 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Audit-Related Fees | | | | | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tax Fees(2) | 170,500 | 6.9 | 240,500 | 8.7 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 38,500 | 1.4 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Fees | 2,485,650 | 100 | 2,758,090 | 100 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
In 2003, the Audit Committee adopted a formal policy concerning approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided to the Company by its independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP. The policy requires that all services provided by KPMG LLP, including audit services and permitted
audit-related and non-audit services, be preapproved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee preapproved all audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG LLP during fiscal year 2019 and our fiscal year ended September 28, 2018 (fiscal year 2018).
Page 36 | Proxy Statement
Report of the Audit Committee |
The Audit Committee of Skyworks Board of Directors is responsible for providing independent, objective oversight of Skyworks accounting functions and internal controls. Seven different directors served on the Audit Committee for all or part of fiscal year 2019, each of whom is independent within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Rules and meets the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board of Directors.
Management is responsible for the Companys internal control and financial reporting process. The Companys independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of Skyworks consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and for issuing a report concerning such financial statements. The Audit Committees responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.
In connection with these responsibilities, the Audit Committee met with management and representatives of KPMG LLP, the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for fiscal year 2019, results of the internal and external audit examinations, evaluations of the Companys internal controls, and the overall quality of Skyworks financial reporting. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the
matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from its independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC regarding the independent accountants communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the independent registered public accounting firms independence from the Company and its management, including the matters in the written disclosures and letter that were received by the committee from such firm.
Based upon the Audit Committees review and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the audited consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2019, as filed with the SEC.
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE | ||
Balakrishnan S. Iyer, Chairman Timothy R. Furey Christine King David P. McGlade |
Proxy Statement | Page 37
Advisory Vote on the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers (Say-on-Pay Vote) |
We are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described below under Information About Executive and Director Compensation pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act. As we describe below under Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our
executive compensation program embodies a pay-for-performance philosophy that supports our business strategy and aligns the interests of our executives with our stockholders.
Our Board of Directors is asking stockholders to approve a non-binding advisory vote on the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the Companys stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Companys named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and any related material disclosed in this Proxy Statement.
As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding and will not overrule any decision by the Company or the Board of Directors (or any committee thereof), nor will it create or imply any change or addition to the fiduciary duties of the Company or the Board of Directors (or any committee thereof). However, our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors
value the opinions expressed by our stockholders in their vote on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for Named Executive Officers. The next non-binding say-on-pay vote is scheduled to be held at our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Page 38 | Proxy Statement
Information About Executive and Director Compensation
|
Summary and Highlights
|
Financial Highlights from Fiscal Year 2019
Despite a decrease in overall global demand for our products as a result of the U.S.-China trade war, the Company delivered strong financial results in fiscal year 2019:
Other Accomplishments from Fiscal Year 2019
During fiscal year 2019, we broadened our customer set and expanded our suite of applications. Highlights from the year include:
![]() |
![]() |
Proxy Statement | Page 39
Our Executive Compensation Program Reflects Our Pay-for-Performance Philosophy
Page 40 | Proxy Statement
What We Do | ||
![]() |
Heavily weight executive compensation toward at risk, performance-based compensation |
|
![]() |
Balance short-term and long-term incentive compensation |
|
![]() |
Use multi-year vesting for executive officer equity awards |
|
![]() |
Base half of annual performance share award on three-year relative TSR performance metric |
|
![]() |
Maintain robust stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and non-executive directors |
|
![]() |
Structure our executive officer compensation program to encourage appropriate risk-taking |
|
![]() |
Benchmark pay practices against selected peer companies with whom we compete for executive talent |
|
![]() |
Solicit advice from the Compensation Committees independent compensation consultant |
|
![]() |
Hold annual Say-on-Pay advisory vote |
|
![]() |
Conduct regular engagement with stockholders on compensation-related topics |
What We Dont Do | ||
![]() |
Guarantee bonus payments or base salary increases |
|
![]() |
Provide single-trigger change-in-control benefits |
|
![]() |
Provide excise tax gross-up payments in connection with a change in control of the Company |
|
![]() |
Provide excessive perquisites to our executive officers |
|
![]() |
Provide retirement or pension benefits to our executive officers that are not available to employees generally |
|
![]() |
Permit hedging or other forms of speculative transactions by employees or directors |
|
![]() |
Permit pledging by employees or directors |
|
![]() |
Allow for the repricing of stock options without stockholder approval |
|
![]() |
Pay dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned performance shares or restricted stock units |
|
![]() |
Include evergreen provisions or liberal change-in-control definitions in our equity incentive award plans |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
Proxy Statement | Page 41
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section discusses the compensation policies and programs for our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and our three next most highly paid executive officers during fiscal year 2019 as determined under the rules of the SEC. We refer to this group of executive officers as our Named Executive Officers. For fiscal year 2019, our Named Executive Officers were:
Response to Stockholder Vote on Executive Compensation at 2019 Annual Meeting
At our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 72% of the votes cast approved our Say-on-Pay proposalthe annual advisory vote regarding the compensation of the Companys named executive officers. Although we understood this to mean that stockholders generally approved of our compensation policies and determinations in 2019, we also noted that ISS recommended a vote against our Say-on-Pay proposal and that our proposal received lower stockholder support than in prior years.
In response to these voting results, we engaged in formal stockholder outreach following the 2019 Annual Meeting, soliciting feedback from our top 25 institutional stockholders (not including brokerage firms and quantitative funds who have previously indicated that they do not engage in individual conversations with companies) representing approximately 54% of the Companys shares outstanding, including a significant portion of those
stockholders who we believed had voted against the 2019 Say-on-Pay proposal. Stockholders told us that they appreciated the opportunity to engage with management, and conversations covered a variety of governance and compensation-related topics. During our conversations, most of these institutional stockholders expressed approval of the Companys strategy, performance, and management, as well as support for the Companys compensation policies, plan designs, and performance metrics. However, nearly all of the stockholders who had voted against the Say-on-Pay proposal, as well as several of the stockholders who had supported the proposal, indicated a strong preference that the Company provide additional disclosure regarding its performance metrics and achievement against those metrics. Some of the stockholders also noted that their votes had been influenced by ISSs report which recommended against the Say-on-Pay proposal and highlighted concerns about our disclosure of performance metrics and achievement.
After considering this input from our stockholders and reviewing the disclosure of several of our peer companies, the Company has enhanced its disclosure of performance metrics and achievement, providing additional quantitative disclosure regarding our short-term and long-term incentive award programs.
Approach for Determining Form and Amounts of Compensation
The Compensation Committee, which is composed solely of independent directors within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Rules, outside directors within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) (solely for purposes of administering any equity awards that may qualify as grandfathered performance-based compensation), and non-employee directors within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, is responsible for determining all components and amounts of compensation to be paid to our Named Executive Officers, as well as any other executive officers or employees who report directly to the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee sets compensation for the Named Executive
Page 42 | Proxy Statement
Officers, including base salary, short-term incentives, and long-term stock-based incentives, at levels generally intended to be competitive with the compensation of comparable executives in semiconductor companies with which the Company competes for executive talent.
Compensation Program Objectives
The objectives of our executive compensation program are to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified executives to operate our business, and to link the compensation of those executives to improvements in the Companys financial performance and increases in stockholder value. Accordingly, the Compensation Committees goals in establishing our executive compensation program include:
Retention of Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee has engaged Aon/Radford to assist in determining the components and amount of executive compensation. Aon/Radford reports directly to the Compensation Committee, through its chairman, and the Compensation Committee retains the right to terminate or replace the consultant at any time. The consultant advises the
Compensation Committee on such compensation matters as are requested by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee considers the consultants advice on such matters in addition to any other information or factors it considers relevant in making its compensation determinations. In fiscal year 2019, Aon/Radford received $188,430 for survey data and compensation consulting services to the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee has considered the relationships that Aon/Radford has with the Company, the members of the Compensation Committee and our executive officers, as well as the policies that Aon/Radford has in place to maintain its independence and objectivity, and has determined that Aon/Radfords work for the Compensation Committee has not raised any conflicts of interest. Company management has separately engaged Aon Risk Solutions, an affiliate of Aon/Radford, for risk management and insurance brokerage services. The Company paid $259,925 to Aon Risk Solutions in fiscal year 2019 for those services. Additionally, Company management has engaged certain affiliates of Aon/Radford in various jurisdictions for consulting and brokerage services unrelated to executive compensation and benefits, for which the Company paid a total of $23,904 in fiscal year 2019. The Companys management did not seek the Compensation Committees approval for such engagements with affiliates of Aon/Radford.
Role of Chief Executive Officer
The Compensation Committee also considers the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer regarding the compensation of the other Named Executive Officers and each of his other direct reports. These recommendations include an assessment of each individuals responsibilities, experience, performance and contribution to the Companys performance, and also generally take into account internal factors such as scope of role and level in the organization, in addition to external factors such as the current environment for attracting and retaining executives.
Proxy Statement | Page 43
Establishment of Comparator Group Data
In determining compensation for each of the Named Executive Officers, the committee utilizes Comparator Group data for each position. For fiscal year 2019, the Compensation Committee approved Comparator Group data consisting of a 50/50 blend of (i) Aon/Radford survey data of 14 semiconductor companies (where sufficient data was not available in the Aon/Radford semiconductor survey data for a given executive position, the Comparator Group data also included survey data regarding high-technology companies), and (ii) the peer group data for 16 publicly traded semiconductor companies with which the Company competes for executive talent:
Advanced Micro Devices
Analog Devices
Applied Materials
Broadcom Limited
KLA-Tencor
Lam Research
Marvell Technology
Maxim Integrated |
Microchip Technology
Micron Technology
NVIDIA
ON Semiconductor
Qorvo
QUALCOMM
Texas Instruments
Xilinx |
The Compensation Committee annually compares the components and amounts of compensation that we provide to our Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executive Officers with the components and amounts of compensation provided to their counterparts in the Comparator Group and uses this comparison data as a guideline in its review and determination of base salaries, short-term incentives, and long-term stock-based compensation awards, as discussed in further detail below under Components of Compensation. In addition, in setting fiscal year 2019 compensation, the Compensation Committee sought and received input from Aon/Radford regarding the base salaries for the Chief Executive Officer and each of the other executive officers, the incentive targets relating to the short-term incentive program for executive officers, and the individual stock-based compensation awards for executive officers, as well as the related vesting schedules. After reviewing the data
and considering the input, the Compensation Committee established (and the full Board of Directors was advised of) the base salary, short-term incentive target, and long-term stock-based compensation award for each Named Executive Officer.
In determining the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2019, the Compensation Committee focused on (i) competitive levels of compensation for chief executive officers who are leading a company of similar size and complexity, (ii) the importance of retaining a chief executive officer with the strategic, financial, and leadership skills necessary to ensure our continued growth and success, (iii) our Chief Executive Officers role relative to the other Named Executive Officers, (iv) input from the full Board of Directors on our Chief Executive Officers performance, and (v) the length of our Chief Executive Officers service to the Company. Aon/Radford advised the Compensation Committee that the base salary, short-term incentive target opportunity, performance metrics, and equity-based compensation established by the Compensation Committee for fiscal year 2019 were competitive for chief executive officers leading companies of similar size and complexity in the semiconductor industry. Our Chief Executive Officer was not present during the voting or deliberations of the Compensation Committee concerning his compensation. As stated above, however, the Compensation Committee did consider the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer regarding the compensation of the other Named Executive Officers and each of his other direct reports.
The key elements of compensation for our Named Executive Officers are base salary, short-term incentives, long-term stock-based incentives, and health and welfare benefits. For fiscal year 2019, the Compensation Committee sought to make decisions regarding each Named Executive Officers base salary, short-term incentive opportunity, and long-term stock-based incentive award that were competitive within the Comparator Group, with consideration given to the
Page 44 | Proxy Statement
executives role, responsibility, performance, and length of service. Consistent with our objective of having compensation programs that are considered fair to our employees, the Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Companys medical, dental, vision, insurance, and retirement plans under the same terms as such benefits are offered to other benefits-eligible employees.
Base salaries provide our executive officers with a degree of financial certainty and stability in order to attract and retain their services in a competitive market. The Compensation Committee determines a competitive base salary for each executive officer using the Comparator Group data and input provided by Aon/Radford. In order to provide flexibility in consideration of differences in individual executives scope of responsibilities, length of service, and performance, the Compensation Committee did not target a specific percentile of the Comparator Group for executive officer salaries; however, the salaries of the executive officers were generally near the median of the Comparator Group. The base salary for fiscal year 2019 for each Named Executive Officer, as reflected in the table below, increased on average 6.9% from the Named Executive Officers base salary in fiscal year 2018, with increases ranging from 2.0% to 8.9%. Salary increases were based on the market-based salary adjustments recommended by Aon/Radford as well as recommendations by the Chief Executive Officer.
| | | | | | | | |
FY2019 Base Salary ($) |
FY2018 Base Salary ($) |
|||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Liam K. Griffin | 980,000 | 900,000 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Kris Sennesael | 500,000 | 460,000 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | |
| Carlos Bori | 431,000 | 403,000 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Robert J. Terry | 446,000 | 413,000 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | |
| Peter L. Gammel | 410,000 | 402,000 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Our short-term incentive compensation plan for executive officers is established annually by the Compensation Committee. For fiscal year 2019, the Compensation Committee adopted the Fiscal Year 2019 Executive Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan). The Incentive Plan established short-term incentive awards for fiscal year 2019 for certain officers of the Company, including the Named Executive Officers, based on the Companys achievement of corporate performance goals established at the beginning of the fiscal year. Short-term incentive compensation is intended to motivate and reward executives by tying a significant portion of their total cash compensation to the Companys achievement of pre-established performance goals that are generally one year or less in duration. Pursuant to the Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee set a range of short-term incentive compensation that could be earned by each executive officer based on the Comparator Group data, which is expressed as a percentage of the executive officers base salary and which corresponds to the level of achievement of the performance goals.
For each executive officer, short-term incentive compensation at the target level is designed to be near the median short-term incentive compensation of the Comparator Group. After reviewing Comparator Group data, the Compensation Committee increased the target incentive, as a percentage of base salary, for the Chief Financial Officer from 90% for fiscal year 2018 to 100% for fiscal year 2019, and for the Named Executive Officers other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer from 70% for fiscal year 2018 to 80% for fiscal year 2019. The target incentive, as a percentage of base salary, for the Chief Executive Officer was not increased.
Proxy Statement | Page 45
The following table shows the range of short-term incentive compensation that each Named Executive Officer could earn in fiscal year 2019 as a percentage of such executive officers annual base salary.
| | | | | | | | | | |
Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Chief Executive Officer | 80% | 160% | 320% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Chief Financial Officer | 50% | 100% | 200% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Other Executive Officers | 40% | 80% | 160% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
In November 2018, the Compensation Committee established performance goals for fiscal year 2019 based on achieving certain revenue and non-GAAP operating income performance metrics. Each of these two performance goals was weighted equally (50% each) toward payments under the Incentive Plan. The non-GAAP operating income performance goal is based on the Companys publicly disclosed non-GAAP operating incomewhich is calculated by excluding from GAAP operating income share-based compensation expense; acquisition-related expenses; amortization of acquisition-related intangibles; settlements, gains, losses, and impairments; restructuring-related charges; and certain deferred executive compensationafter accounting for any incentive award payments, including those to be made under the Incentive Plan.
The target level performance goals established by the Compensation Committee under the Incentive Plan are based on the Companys historical operating results and growth rates as well as the Companys expected future results and are designed to require significant effort and operational success on the part of our executives and the Company to achieve them. The maximum level performance goals established by the Compensation Committee have historically been difficult to achieve and are designed to represent outstanding performance that the Compensation Committee believes should be rewarded.
The performance goals established under the Incentive Plan for fiscal 2019 were as follows (in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | |
Company Metric | Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | $3,868 | $4,000 | $4,120 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Non-GAAP Operating Income | $1,450 | $1,500 | $1,555 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
The Incentive Plan stipulated that any payouts to executives, under either of the performance metrics, were conditioned upon the Company achieving a nominal level of non-GAAP operating income of $1,305 million.
Calculation of Incentive Plan Payments
Following the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines the total amount of short-term incentive compensation payable to each executive for such period by comparing the actual level of achievement of each performance goal against the threshold, target, and maximum levels of achievement that it set for that performance goal. Specifically, the Compensation Committee determines the amount of short-term incentive compensation the executive is eligible to receive with respect to each performance goal as follows:
Page 46 | Proxy Statement
Each executives payment under the Incentive Plan is calculated by evaluating achievement of each performance goal individually, determining the portion of the total eligible incentive payment earned with respect to each such performance goal, and totaling the resulting amounts. The Compensation Committee retained the discretion to make payments, upon consideration of recommendations by the Chief Executive Officer, even if the threshold performance metrics were not met or if the nominal level of non-GAAP operating income was not met or to make payments in excess of the maximum level if the Companys performance exceeded the maximum metrics. The Compensation Committee believed it was appropriate to retain this discretion in order to make short-term incentive compensation awards in extraordinary circumstances.
The Companys revenue and non-GAAP operating income achieved in fiscal year 2019 were $3,377 million and $1,166 million, respectively, resulting in the Companys failure to meet either the revenue or non-GAAP operating income goals at the threshold level or to meet the nominal level of non-GAAP operating income under the Incentive Plan. These financial results reflected the adverse impact of the U.S.-China trade war (the Trade War) during fiscal year 2019. In connection with the Trade War, not only did the Company experience an overall reduction in customer demand for its products, but the U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security of the U.S. Department of Commerce also placed Huawei and certain of its affiliates on the Bureaus Entity List in May 2019 (the Huawei Ban). The Huawei Ban
resulted in significantly reduced shipments to, and revenue from, Huawei during the remainder of the fiscal year. The negative effects of the Trade War had not been anticipated by the Compensation Committee when it originally established performance targets for fiscal year 2019.
In November 2019, following the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determined that the adverse impact of the Trade War (as described above) was outside of managements control. Given the extraordinary and unexpected nature of such impact, the Compensation Committee waived the condition under the Incentive Plan that the Company achieve a nominal level of non-GAAP operating income and made adjustments to the revenue and non-GAAP operating income metrics of the Incentive Plan. Specifically, after considering a detailed analysis of multiple effects of the Trade War on the Companys financial results, the Compensation Committee adjusted the Companys performance metrics, for purposes of calculating payments under the Incentive Plan, to account for $564 million and $285 million in estimated revenue and non-GAAP operating income lost by the Company during fiscal year 2019, respectively, as a result of the Trade War. The Companys revenue and non-GAAP operating income achieved in fiscal year 2019, under the Incentive Plan as adjusted, equated to achievement of 77.7% and 51.3% of the target level, respectively, and resulted in a payment to each Named Executive Officer equal to 64.5% of the Named Executive Officers target incentive.
With respect to the Companys non-executive incentive planswhich originally had performance goals that were, depending on the business unit, either equivalent to or based on the performance goals established under the Incentive Planthe Compensation Committee elected in February 2019 to make a downward adjustment to the respective performance goals, in order to account for the initial impacts of the Trade War on the Companys financial performance. These midyear goal adjustments, together with later adjustments related to the Huawei Ban, resulted in
Proxy Statement | Page 47
incentive payments to non-executive employees equal to, on average, 78% of the employees target incentives. The Incentive Plan awards paid to the Named Executive Officers were lower, as a percentage of the target incentive, than the average short-term incentive awards paid to non-executive employees of the Company for fiscal year 2019.
Long-Term Stock-Based Compensation
The Compensation Committee generally makes long-term stock-based compensation awards to executive officers on an annual basis. Long-term stock-based compensation awards are intended to align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders and to reward our executive officers for increases in stockholder value over periods of time greater than one year. It is the Companys practice to make stock-based compensation awards to executive officers in November of each year at a prescheduled Compensation Committee meeting. For fiscal year 2019, the Compensation Committee made awards to each of the Named Executive Officers on November 6, 2018, at a regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting.
Fiscal Year 2019 Stock-Based Compensation Awards
In making annual stock-based compensation awards to executive officers for fiscal year 2019, the Compensation Committee first reviewed the Comparator Group grant data by executive position. The Compensation Committee used that data to determine a dollar value equivalent for the long-term equity-based award for each executive officer, targeting awards for fiscal year 2019 that were competitive within the Comparator Group. After setting award levels by position and evaluating the Companys business needs for the attraction and retention of executives and employees as well as internal and external circumstances impacting the Company and its employees, the Compensation Committee also reviewed the Comparator Group data to set the
aggregate number of shares of the Companys common stock that would be made available for annual equity awards to eligible employees of the Company, as a percentage of the total number of the outstanding shares of the Companys common stock.
Sixty percent (60%) of the dollar equivalent value of each executive officers long-term equity-based award served as the basis for determining a number of performance share awards (PSAs) to award to the executive using the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of such award and an assumption that the Company would achieve the target level of performance required to earn the PSA. The remaining forty percent (40%) of the dollar value equivalent served as the basis for determining a number of restricted stock units (RSUs) to award to the executive using the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of such award. The Compensation Committees rationale for awarding PSAs is to further align the executives interest with those of the Companys stockholders by using equity awards that will vest only if the Company achieves pre-established performance metrics, and we believe the Compensation Committees decision to award a portion of the PSAs subject to a performance metric measured over a three-year performance period more closely aligns the executives interests with those of the Companys stockholders.
The PSAs granted on November 6, 2018 (the FY19 PSAs), have both performance and continued employment conditions that must be met in order for the executive to receive shares underlying the award.
The performance condition of the FY19 PSAs compares the non-GAAP EBITDA growth achieved (with respect to 50% of the shares underlying the PSA award) and the total stockholder return, or TSR, percentile ranking achieved with respect to our peer group (with respect to the other 50% of the shares underlying the PSA award) during the applicable
Page 48 | Proxy Statement
performance period against a range of pre-established targets, as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Company Metric | Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
1-year Non-GAAP EBITDA Growth (%) | 0.0% | 3.3% | 7.1% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
3-year TSR Percentile Ranking | 40th | 50th | 90th | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
The performance period with respect to the non-GAAP EBITDA growth metric was the Companys fiscal year 2019 and the performance period with respect to the TSR percentile ranking metric is the three-year period comprising the Companys fiscal years 2019, 2020, and 2021. The peer group for purposes of the TSR percentile ranking metric includes each of the companies in the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index as of November 6, 2018, but excludes any such company that during the three-year performance period is acquired by or merged with (or enters into an agreement to be acquired by or merged with) another entity.
The number of shares issuable under the FY19 PSAs corresponds to the level of achievement of the performance goals, as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Performance Achieved | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
% of Target Level Shares Earned With Respect to Non-GAAP EBITDA Growth Metric | 50% | 100% | 200% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
% of Target Level Shares Earned With Respect to TSR Percentile Ranking Metric | 50% | 100% | 300% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Performance in between either the threshold and target levels or the target and maximum levels results in the issuance of an interpolated number of shares between the number of shares issuable under the FY19 PSAs at, respectively, the threshold and target levels or the target and maximum levels.
The non-GAAP EBITDA growth performance goal is calculated by adding depreciation and amortization to the Companys non-GAAP operating income, as publicly reported in the Companys earnings release
for the applicable period, after making certain adjustments if necessary to account for certain qualifying acquisition or disposition activities.
The continued employment condition of the FY19 PSAs provides that, to the extent that the non-GAAP EBITDA growth performance metric was met, 50% of the total shares earned under such metric would vest on the first anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% of the total shares earned under such metric would vest on the second anniversary of the grant date, and to the extent that the TSR percentile ranking performance metric was met, 100% of the total shares earned under such metric would vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, provided, in each case, that the executive remains employed by the Company through each such vesting date. In the event of termination by reason of death or permanent disability, the holder of an FY19 PSA (or the holders estate) would receive any earned but unissued shares that would have been issuable thereunder during the remaining term of the award.
During fiscal year 2018, the base period against which fiscal year 2019 performance was measured, the Company achieved non-GAAP EBITDA of $1,728 million. During fiscal year 2019, the Company achieved non-GAAP EBITDA of $1,494 million, failing to achieve the threshold non-GAAP EBITDA growth performance goal. Although the Companys non-GAAP EBITDA for fiscal year 2019 was negatively affected by the Trade War, the Compensation Committee elected not to make an adjustment to the non-GAAP EBITDA Growth performance metric for the FY19 PSAs. As a result, no shares were earned by the executives with respect to the non-GAAP EBITDA growth performance metric, and all FY19 PSAs with respect to such performance metric were cancelled.
In February 2019, the Compensation Committee authorized a supplemental RSU grant to non-executive employees who had received FY19 PSAs (which were granted on the same terms as FY19 PSAs awarded to the Named Executive Officers) in recognition that the threshold non-GAAP EBITDA growth performance
Proxy Statement | Page 49
goal under the FY19 PSAs was unlikely to be met as a result of the initial impacts of the Trade War. The Companys executive officers did not receive this supplemental RSU grant.
As summarized in the table below of PSAs granted since fiscal year 2018 (the first year in which the
Compensation Committee awarded PSAs subject to a performance metric measured over a three-year performance period), achievement of the TSR percentile ranking performance metric under the FY19 PSAs, which is subject to a three-year performance period, will be determined following the conclusion of the Companys fiscal year 2021.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
PSA Fiscal Year |
Grant Date |
Performance Metric | Performance Period |
Achieved (% of Target) | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
FY18 |
11/7/2017 | Non-GAAP EBITDA Growth | FY18 | 99.8% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
FY18 |
11/7/2017 | 3-year TSR Percentile Ranking | FY18FY20 | Performance Period in Progress(1) | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
FY19 |
11/6/2018 | Non-GAAP EBITDA Growth | FY19 | 0% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
FY19 |
11/6/2018 | 3-year TSR Percentile Ranking | FY19FY21 | Performance Period in Progress(2) | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Compensation and Benefits
We provide other benefits to our executive officers that are intended to be part of a competitive overall compensation program and are not tied to any company performance criteria. The Company offers medical, dental, vision, life, and disability insurance plans to executive officers under the same terms as such benefits are offered to other benefits-eligible employees. Executive officers are also permitted to participate in the Companys 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan under the same terms as other benefits-eligible employees. The Company does not provide executive officers with any enhanced retirement benefits (i.e., executive officers are subject to the same limits on contributions as other employees, as the Company does not offer any supplemental executive retirement plan or other similar non-qualified deferred compensation plan), and they are eligible for 401(k) company-match contributions under the same terms as other employees.
In previous years, the Company offered executives the opportunity to participate in financial planning
services through a third-party firm at a cost of up to approximately $19,000 per executive paid by the Company. The Compensation Committee replaced this benefit for fiscal year 2019 with a reimbursement program providing up to an aggregate of $20,000 to each executive for the purchase of financial planning services, estate planning services, personal tax planning and preparation services, and/or an executive physical. No tax gross-up was provided for such reimbursements. In fiscal year 2019, Messrs. Griffin, Sennesael, Gammel, and Terry received reimbursement in connection with such services.
International Assignment Agreement with Mr. Gammel
In connection with his relocation to Japan, the Company and Mr. Gammel entered into an International Assignment Agreement (the International Assignment Agreement), pursuant to which Mr. Gammel received: (a) tax equalization payments, which were intended to leave Mr. Gammel in a net after-tax position substantially equivalent to what he would experience if he were subject only to
Page 50 | Proxy Statement
U.S. federal and state income taxes during the period of the assignment, (b) payment of, or reimbursement for, certain costs related to his relocation to Japan, including moving expenses, a car allowance, housing costs in Japan, and travel costs to return periodically to the United States, and (c) repatriation relocation benefits at the completion of his assignment.
Severance and Change-in-Control Benefits
None of our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, has an employment agreement that provides a specific term of employment with the Company. Accordingly, the employment of any such employee may be terminated at any time. We do provide certain benefits to our Named Executive Officers upon certain qualifying terminations of employment and in connection with terminations of employment under certain circumstances following a change in control. A description of the material terms of our severance and change-in-control arrangements with the Named Executive Officers can be found immediately below and further below under Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.
The Compensation Committee believes that severance protections can play a valuable role in recruiting and retaining superior talent. Severance and other termination benefits are an effective way to offer executives financial security to incent them to forego an opportunity with another company. These agreements also protect the Company as the Named Executive Officers are bound by non-compete and/or non-solicit covenants for up to two years after termination of employment. Outside of the change-in-control context, each Named Executive Officer is entitled to severance benefits if his employment is involuntarily terminated by the Company without cause and, in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, if he terminates his own employment for good reason (as defined in the Chief Executive Officers change-in-control agreement). The level of each Named Executive Officers cash severance or other termination benefit is generally tied to his annual base salary and short-term incentive amounts.
Additionally, each Named Executive Officer would receive enhanced severance benefits and accelerated vesting of equity awards if his employment were terminated under certain circumstances in connection with a change in control of the Company. These benefits are described in detail further below under Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control. The Compensation Committee believes these enhanced severance benefits and accelerated vesting are appropriate because the occurrence, or potential occurrence, of a change-in-control transaction would likely create uncertainty regarding the continued employment of executive officers that typically occurs in a change-in-control context, and such severance benefits and accelerated vesting encourage the Named Executive Officers to remain employed with the Company through the change-in-control process and to focus on enhancing stockholder value both before and during the process. In addition, the vesting protection helps assure the Named Executive Officers that they will not lose the expected value of their equity awards because of a change in control of the Company.
Executive Officer Stock Ownership Requirements
We have adopted Executive Stock Ownership guidelines with the objective of more closely aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. Under the Executive Officer Ownership guidelines, our Chief Executive Officer is required to hold the lower of (a) the number of shares with a fair market value equal to six (6) times such executives current base salary, or (b) 147,000 shares; and our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, our Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing, and our Senior Vice President and General Counsel are each required to hold the lower of (a) the number of shares with a fair market value equal to two and one-half (21/2) times such executives current base salary, or (b) 31,300, 26,900 or 27,900 shares, respectively. For purposes of the Executive Stock Ownership guidelines, the fair market value of the Companys common stock is the average closing price per share of the Companys common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global
Proxy Statement | Page 51
Select Market (or if the common stock is not then traded on such market, such other market on which the common stock is traded) for the twelve (12) month period ending with the determination date. All of our Named Executive Officers who remain employed by the Company are in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines as of the date hereof.
Prohibition on Hedging and Certain Other Transactions
We prohibit our directors, officers, and employees (or any of their designees) from directly or indirectly engaging in the following transactions with respect to securities of the Company:
In addition, we prohibit our directors, officers, and employees from purchasing Company securities on margin, borrowing against Company securities held in a margin account, or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.
Compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)
For fiscal years beginning on or before December 31, 2017, certain compensation, including qualified performance-based compensation and compensation paid to our Chief Financial Officer, was not subject to the deduction limit imposed by Section 162(m) of the IRC on annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to certain of our executive officers if applicable requirements were met. Pursuant to tax reform legislation enacted at the end of 2017, subject to certain transition rules, for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017, including fiscal year 2019 (which began on September 29, 2018), the performance-based compensation exception to the deduction limit under Section 162(m) is no longer available, and compensation paid to our Chief Financial Officer is also subject to the deduction limit. As a result, with the exception of compensation grandfathered pursuant to the transition rules, for such fiscal years the Company will be unable to deduct compensation in excess of $1 million paid to certain executive officers, as specified under Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee reviews the potential effect of Section 162(m) periodically and uses its judgment to authorize compensation payments that may be subject to the limit when the Compensation Committee believes such payments are appropriate and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
Page 52 | Proxy Statement
Compensation Tables for Named Executive Officers |
The following table summarizes compensation earned by, or awarded or paid to, our Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2019, fiscal year 2018, and our fiscal year ended September 29, 2017 (fiscal year 2017).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal Position |
Year | Salary ($) |
Stock Awards ($)(1) |
Option Awards ($)(1) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(2) |
All Other Compensation ($)(3) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liam K. Griffin | 2019 | 972,000 | 11,658,937 | | 1,011,257 | 18,399 | 13,660,593 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
President and Chief |
2018 | 894,808 | 7,150,399 | | 1,284,664 | 12,242 | 9,342,113 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Executive Officer |
2017 | 850,000 | 5,336,603 | 1,230,158 | 1,273,055 | 12,042 | 8,701,858 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Kris Sennesael | 2019 | 496,000 | 3,264,443 | | 322,467 | 15,352 | 4,098,262 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Vice President and |
2018 | 456,366 | 2,491,910 | | 369,341 | 13,075 | 3,330,692 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chief Financial Officer |
2017 | 425,000 | 1,289,639 | 297,268 | 358,047 | 235,494 | 2,605,448 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Carlos S. Bori | 2019 | 428,200 | 3,147,860 | | 222,373 | 12,561 | 3,810,994 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Vice President, |
2018 | 398,535 | 2,491,910 | | 251,669 | 12,346 | 3,154,460 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales and Marketing |
2017 | 356,493 | 1,245,174 | 287,025 | 235,890 | 31,244 | 2,155,826 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Robert J. Terry(4) | 2019 | 442,700 | 1,981,920 | | 230,112 | 15,287 | 2,670,019 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
2018 | 409,054 | 1,557,371 | | 257,914 | 12,466 | 2,236,805 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Peter L. Gammel(5) | 2019 | 409,200 | 1,165,835 | | 211,538 | 1,140,824 | 2,927,397 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Former Chief |
2018 | 400,754 | 1,245,896 | | 251,045 | 389,623 | 2,287,318 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Technology Officer |
2017 | 389,065 | 978,287 | 225,523 | 255,547 | 73,367 | 1,921,789 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proxy Statement | Page 53
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table summarizes all grants of plan-based awards made to the Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 2019, including incentive awards payable under our Fiscal Year 2019 Executive Incentive Plan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
All Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Grant | |||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Future Payouts Under | Estimated Future Payouts | Awards: | Date Fair | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-Equity Incentive Plan | Under Equity Incentive Plan | Number | Value of | |||||||||||||||||||
Awards(1) | Awards(2) | of Stock | Stock and | |||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Grant Date |
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Threshold (#) |
Target (#) |
Maximum (#) |
Or Units (#)(3) |
Option Awards ($) |
|||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liam K. Griffin | 784,000 | 1,568,000 | 3,136,000 | | | | | | | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11/6/2018 | 36,302 | 72,604 | 181,510 | 7,658,996(4) | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11/6/2018 | 48,402 | 3,999,941(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Kris Sennesael | | 250,000 | 500,000 | 1,000,000 | | | | | | | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11/6/2018 | 10,164 | 20,329 | 50,822 | 2,144,506(4) | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11/6/2018 | 13,552 | 1,119,937(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Carlos S. Bori | | 172,400 | 344,800 | 689,600 | | | | | | | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11/6/2018 | 9,801 | 19,603 | 49,007 | 2,067,920(4) | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11/6/2018 | 13,068 | 1,079,940(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Robert J. Terry | | 178,400 | 356,800 | 713,600 | | | | | | | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11/6/2018 | 6,171 | 12,342 | 30,855 | 1,301,958(4) | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11/6/2018 | 8,228 | 679,962(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Peter L. Gammel | | 164,000 | 328,000 | 656,000 | | | | | | | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11/6/2018 | 3,630 | 7,260 | 18,150 | 765,857(4) | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11/6/2018 | 4,840 | 399,978(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Page 54 | Proxy Statement
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table
The following table summarizes the unvested stock awards and all stock options held by the Named Executive Officers as of the end of fiscal year 2019.
|
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($)(1) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or other Rights that Have Not Vested (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or other Rights that Have Not Vested ($)(1) |
|||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Liam K. Griffin |
21,500 | 10,750(2) | 84.89 | 11/9/2022 | 46,356(5) | 3,591,199 | 9,290(11) | 719,696 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
18,250 | 18,250(3) | 64.59 | 5/11/2023 | 9,271(6) | 718,224 | 18,151(12) | 1,406,158 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
13,211 | 26,422(4) | 77.66 | 11/9/2023 | 6,500(7) | 503,555 | 18,151(13) | 1,406,158 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
7,725(8) | 598,456 | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
18,581(9) | 1,439,470 | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
48,402(10) | 3,749,703 | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Kris Sennesael |
30,000 | 10,000(14) | 75.22 | 8/29/2023 | 11,202(5) | 867,819 | 3,238(11) | 250,848 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
6,386 | 6,384(4) | 77.66 | 11/9/2023 | 3,231(6) | 250,306 | 5,082(12) | 393,703 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
6,250(15) | 484,188 | 5,082(13) | 393,703 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
1,866(8) | 144,559 | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
6,475(9) | 501,618 | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
13,552(10) | 1,049,873 | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Carlos S. Bori |
1,500 | | 60.97 | 11/10/2021 | 10,816(5) | 837,916 | 3,238(11) | 250,848 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
3,894 | 1,297(2) | 84.89 | 11/9/2022 | 3,231(6) | 250,306 | 4,900(12) |